305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31066937)
1. Retrospective clinical evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: Mean follow-up of 15 years.
Chrcanovic BR; Kisch J; Larsson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jul; 30(7):691-701. PubMed ID: 31066937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk Factors Associated with Failure and Technical Complications of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A Retrospective Study.
Larsson A; Manuh J; Chrcanovic BR
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Sep; 59(9):. PubMed ID: 37763722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].
Liang F; Wu MJ; Zou LD
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):970-976. PubMed ID: 34650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complication and failure rates with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: a 10-year retrospective study.
Wittneben JG; Buser D; Salvi GE; Bürgin W; Hicklin S; Brägger U
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 16(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 23551688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study.
Alhammadi SH; Burnside G; Milosevic A
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):171. PubMed ID: 33794841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Performance of Short Dental Implants Supporting Single Crown Restoration in the Molar-Premolar Region: Cement Versus Screw Retention.
Anitua E; Alkhraisat MH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):969–976. PubMed ID: 30768661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of implant-supported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years follow-up.
Frisch E; Ziebolz D; Rinke S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Dec; 24(12):1281-7. PubMed ID: 22882661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
Kinsel RP; Lin D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.
Obermeier M; Ristow O; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):981-991. PubMed ID: 28710653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.
Pjetursson BE; Valente NA; Strasding M; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():199-214. PubMed ID: 30328190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double crown-retained maxillary overdentures: 5-year follow-up.
Frisch E; Ziebolz D; Ratka-Krüger P; Rinke S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 23679159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical Complications and Prosthesis Survival Rates with Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 12-Year Follow-Up.
Papaspyridakos P; Bordin TB; Kim YJ; El-Rafie K; Pagni SE; Natto ZS; Teixeira ER; Chochlidakis K; Weber HP
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 31650669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective evaluation of implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prostheses after a mean follow-up of 10 years.
Chrcanovic BR; Kisch J; Larsson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):634-645. PubMed ID: 32249972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns.
Kraus RD; Espuelas C; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Sailer I; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 May; 33(5):537-547. PubMed ID: 35224774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants.
Krennmair G; Schmidinger S; Waldenberger O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 11858577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Zirconia-Based Screw-Retained Prostheses Supported by Implants: A Retrospective Study on Technical Complications and Failures.
Worni A; Kolgeci L; Rentsch-Kollar A; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1073-81. PubMed ID: 24576088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results.
Cacaci C; Cantner F; Mücke T; Randelzhofer P; Hajtó J; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jul; 21(6):1953-1959. PubMed ID: 27796574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
