163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31067550)
1. Single-Field Non-Mydriatic Fundus Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hu J; Chen R; Lu Y; Dou X; Ye B; Cai Z; Pu Z; Mou L
Ophthalmic Res; 2019; 62(2):61-67. PubMed ID: 31067550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-field non-mydriatic fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu D; Dou X; Chen J; Lu Y; Ye B; Wu X; Wu Z; Li Q; Tian X; Zhou B; Deng Y; Li W; Hu X; Mou L; Pu Z
BMJ Open; 2021 Oct; 11(10):e051761. PubMed ID: 34663665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Olson JA; Strachan FM; Hipwell JH; Goatman KA; McHardy KC; Forrester JV; Sharp PF
Diabet Med; 2003 Jul; 20(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 12823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Screening for diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus photography: First national campaign in Lebanon].
Arej N; Antoun J; Waked R; Saab C; Saleh M; Waked N
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2019 Mar; 42(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 30857804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different methods of retinal imaging for the screening of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review.
Kárason KT; Vo D; Grauslund J; Rasmussen ML
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 100(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 33529402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy.
Scanlon PH; Malhotra R; Thomas G; Foy C; Kirkpatrick JN; Lewis-Barned N; Harney B; Aldington SJ
Diabet Med; 2003 Jun; 20(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 12786681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan.
Fahadullah M; Memon NA; Salim S; Ahsan S; Fahim MF; Mumtaz SN; Shaikh SA; Memon MS
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 30890831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison Among Methods of Retinopathy Assessment (CAMRA) Study: Smartphone, Nonmydriatic, and Mydriatic Photography.
Ryan ME; Rajalakshmi R; Prathiba V; Anjana RM; Ranjani H; Narayan KM; Olsen TW; Mohan V; Ward LA; Lynn MJ; Hendrick AM
Ophthalmology; 2015 Oct; 122(10):2038-43. PubMed ID: 26189190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of diabetic retinopathy screening using a non-mydriatic retinal digital camera in primary care settings in south Israel.
Mizrachi Y; Knyazer B; Guigui S; Rosen S; Lifshitz T; Belfair N; Klemperer I; Schneck M; Levy J
Int Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 34(4):831-7. PubMed ID: 24292883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review: Can non-mydriatic cameras accurately detect diabetic retinopathy?
Bedard C; Sherry Liu S; Patterson C; Gerstein H; Griffith L
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 129():154-159. PubMed ID: 28528076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
Wilson PJ; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Ellingford A; Talbot J; Leese GP
Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 20145421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of detection of any level of diabetic retinopathy using digital retinal imaging.
Piyasena MMPN; Murthy GVS; Yip JLY; Gilbert C; Peto T; Gordon I; Hewage S; Kamalakannan S
Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):182. PubMed ID: 30404665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Photographic Screening Methods for Diabetic Retinopathy - A Meta-analysis.
Yan W; McGuinness M; Chakrabarti R; Fotis K; Finger RP
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 30(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 35599625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic accuracy of single- and five-field fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening by primary care physicians.
Srihatrai P; Hlowchitsieng T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 66(1):94-97. PubMed ID: 29283131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protecting Vision in Patients With Diabetes With Ultra-Widefield Imaging: A Review of Current Literature.
Singh RP; Hsueh J; Han MM; Kuriyan AE; Conti FF; Steinle N; Weng CY; Wong RW; Martinez JA; Wykoff CC
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina; 2019 Oct; 50(10):639-648. PubMed ID: 31671197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
