These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3106766)

  • 1. [Dentin adhesive compound in Black's class V cavities treated with different detergents].
    Debernardi C; Tomba D
    Minerva Stomatol; 1987; 36(1-2):29-36. PubMed ID: 3106766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A scanning electron microscopy study of dentin and enamel surfaces treated with three new resin adhesive systems.
    Barkmeier WW; Gwinnett AJ
    Compendium; 1989 Mar; 10(3):145-6, 148-9, 152-3. PubMed ID: 2513124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Dental tissue-composite bonding. SEM study].
    Menghini P; Piacentini C; Marchetti C
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 May; 59(9):46-53. PubMed ID: 1907575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth.
    Fritz U; García-Godoy F; Finger WJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9096816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The problem of adhesion in esthetic restorations].
    Gallusi G; Dolci G; Cirillo R; Bambini F
    Dent Cadmos; 1988 Nov; 56(17):48-50, 53-6, 61-2 passim. PubMed ID: 3152026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of new Tubulicid on smear layer removal.
    Vieira E; Jodaikin A; Austin J
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1982 Dec; 37(12):868-9. PubMed ID: 6820980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glutaraldehyde-methacrylate dentine adhesive: the relationship between cavity site and marginal contraction gaps.
    Soh G; Henderson LJ; Chantler P
    Singapore Dent J; 1988 Dec; 13(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 3155334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of hybridization on marginal leakage and bond strength.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Vichi A; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 11764128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assessment of marginal sealing using 7 dentin adhesive systems.
    Zivković S
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 11203961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory evaluation of the Gluma 3-step bonding system.
    Strydom C; Retief DH; Russell CM; Denys FR
    Am J Dent; 1995 Apr; 8(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 7546486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Action of detergents on the hard dental tissues: observations by scanning electron microscopy].
    Perotti R; Dicuonzo G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1987 Dec; 36(12):1015-22. PubMed ID: 3482301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of chlorhexidine on dentin surfaces and shear bond strengths.
    Perdigao J; Denehy GE; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 8054190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of two chelating agents on smear layer removal from cavity preparations: an in vivo study.
    Jodaikin A; Austin JC; Vieira E
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1981 Sep; 36(9):615-7. PubMed ID: 6808711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histopathological response of infected cavities treated with Gluma and Scotchbond dentin bonding agents.
    Cox CF; Felton D; Bergenholtz G
    Am J Dent; 1988 Sep; 1 Spec No():189-94. PubMed ID: 3150282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.