These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31067983)

  • 21. Cueing, demand fading, and positive reinforcement to establish self-feeding and oral consumption in a child with chronic food refusal.
    Luiselli JK
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jul; 24(3):348-58. PubMed ID: 10881381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of a concurrent operants paradigm to evaluate positive reinforcers during treatment of food refusal.
    Cooper LJ; Wacker DP; Brown K; McComas JJ; Peck SM; Drew J; Asmus J; Kayser K
    Behav Modif; 1999 Jan; 23(1):3-40. PubMed ID: 9926520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the relative contributions of positive reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.
    Piazza CC; Patel MR; Gulotta CS; Sevin BM; Layer SA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):309-24. PubMed ID: 14596572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of differential reinforcement with stimulus fading as an intervention for medical compliance.
    Stuesser HA; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1606-1621. PubMed ID: 32056207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Manipulating parameters of reinforcement to reduce problem behavior without extinction.
    Kunnavatana SS; Bloom SE; Samaha AL; Slocum TA; Clay CJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Apr; 51(2):283-302. PubMed ID: 29473653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of bite-presentation methods in the treatment of food refusal.
    Sharp WG; Harker S; Jaquess DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(4):739-43. PubMed ID: 21541159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combining sensory reinforcement and texture fading procedures to overcome chronic food refusal.
    Luiselli JK; Gleason DJ
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1987 Jun; 18(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 3475290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of the high-probability instructional sequence and escape extinction in a child with food refusal.
    Dawson JE; Piazza CC; Sevin BM; Gulotta CS; Lerman D; Kelley ML
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 12723872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of resurgence following functional communication training conducted in alternative antecedent contexts via telehealth.
    Suess AN; Schieltz KM; Wacker DP; Detrick J; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jan; 113(1):278-301. PubMed ID: 31617951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of treatment integrity failures during differential reinforcement of alternative behavior: a translational model.
    St Peter Pipkin C; Vollmer TR; Sloman KN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010 Mar; 43(1):47-70. PubMed ID: 20808495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior increases resistance to extinction: clinical demonstration, animal modeling, and clinical test of one solution.
    Mace FC; McComas JJ; Mauro BC; Progar PR; Taylor B; Ervin R; Zangrillo AN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 21119850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relations between rate of negative reinforcement and the persistence of task completion.
    Romani PW; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Lustig NH; Vinquist KM; Northup J; Kane AM; Carrion DP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 26412807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Additional free reinforcers increase persistence of problem behavior in a clinical context: A partial replication of laboratory findings.
    Lieving GA; DeLeon IG; Carreau-Webster AB; Frank-Crawford MA; Triggs MM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):253-264. PubMed ID: 29380436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing main and collateral effects of extinction and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.
    Petscher ES; Bailey JS
    Behav Modif; 2008 Jul; 32(4):468-88. PubMed ID: 18525062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the definition of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.
    Vollmer TR; Peters KP; Kronfli FR; Lloveras LA; Ibañez VF
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1299-1303. PubMed ID: 32196670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Persistence during and resurgence following noncontingent reinforcement implemented with and without extinction.
    Saini V; Fisher WW; Pisman MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Apr; 50(2):377-392. PubMed ID: 28276578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment of resistance to change in children with autism.
    Fisher WW; Felber JM; Phillips LA; Craig AR; Paden AR; Niemeier JJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Oct; 52(4):974-993. PubMed ID: 31219184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Combined Effects of Immediate and Delayed Positive Reinforcement to Increase Consumption of Solid Food: A Brief Report.
    Williams K; Adams W; Creek L
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2019 Nov; 22(8):576-580. PubMed ID: 31362567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Descriptive analyses of pediatric food refusal and acceptance.
    Borrero CS; Woods JN; Borrero JC; Masler EA; Lesser AD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010 Mar; 43(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 20808496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of delayed reinforcement on skill acquisition during discrete-trial instruction: Implications for treatmen-integrity errors in academic settings.
    Carroll RA; Kodak T; Adolf KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 26947579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.