295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31068172)
1. Femoral fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register - a validity study.
Knutsson SB; Wennergren D; Bojan A; Ekelund J; Möller M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):197. PubMed ID: 31068172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
Wennergren D; Ekholm C; Sundfeldt M; Karlsson J; Bhandari M; Möller M
Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 26620119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Substantial accuracy of fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register: Evaluation of AO/OTA-classification in 152 ankle fractures.
Juto H; Möller M; Wennergren D; Edin K; Apelqvist I; Morberg P
Injury; 2016 Nov; 47(11):2579-2583. PubMed ID: 27645617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register.
Bergvall M; Bergdahl C; Ekholm C; Wennergren D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jun; 22(1):587. PubMed ID: 34174861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of humerus fracture classification in the Swedish fracture register.
Wennergren D; Stjernström S; Möller M; Sundfeldt M; Ekholm C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jun; 18(1):251. PubMed ID: 28601085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the classification of surgically treated acetabular fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
Albrektsson M; Wolf O; Enocson A; Sundfeldt M
Injury; 2022 Jun; 53(6):2145-2149. PubMed ID: 35287965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the Robinson classification of clavicle fractures accurate enough within the setting of the Swedish Fracture Register?
Kihlström C; Hailer NP; Wolf O
Injury; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37142482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification.
Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications.
Cazzato G; Oliva MS; Masci G; Vitiello R; Smimmo A; Matrangolo MR; Palmacci O; D'Adamio S; Ziranu A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 22(Suppl 2):1063. PubMed ID: 35078436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
Glen LZQ; Wong JYS; Tay WX; Li TP; Phua SKA; Manohara R; Chee YH
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R
Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients with more complex ankle fractures are associated with poorer patient-reported outcome: an observational study of 11,733 patients from the Swedish Fracture Register.
Stigevall C; Möller M; Wennergren D; Wolf O; Ekelund J; Bergdahl C
Acta Orthop; 2024 May; 95():212-218. PubMed ID: 38712854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study.
Ansorge A; de Foy M; Poncet A; Gamulin A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 107(6):102999. PubMed ID: 34216840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreements of the New AO/OTA Classification for Fractures of the Trochanteric Region and the Femoral Neck.
Busato TS; Baldasso D; Matioski Filho GR; Godoi LD; Morozowski MG; Capriotti JRV
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2022 Apr; 57(2):241-249. PubMed ID: 35652025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Evaluation of Femoral Head Fractures: Which Classification Systems Have the Best Universality, Reliability, and Reproducibility?
Wu S; Qian G; Huang Q; Dou B; Zheng Q; Wang W; Zhu X; Mei J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 482(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 37326487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
Wennergren D; Bergdahl C; Ekelund J; Juto H; Sundfeldt M; Möller M
Injury; 2018 Nov; 49(11):2068-2074. PubMed ID: 30220634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
