115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31068178)
1. Machine learning to help researchers evaluate biases in clinical trials: a prospective, randomized user study.
Soboczenski F; Trikalinos TA; Kuiper J; Bias RG; Wallace BC; Marshall IJ
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 May; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31068178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automating risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a real-time mixed methods comparison of human researchers to a machine learning system.
Jardim PSJ; Rose CJ; Ames HM; Echavez JFM; Van de Velde S; Muller AE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):167. PubMed ID: 35676632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing machine and human reviewers to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials.
Armijo-Olivo S; Craig R; Campbell S
Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 32065732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement in Risk of Bias Assessment Between RobotReviewer and Human Reviewers: An Evaluation Study on Randomised Controlled Trials in Nursing-Related Cochrane Reviews.
Hirt J; Meichlinger J; Schumacher P; Mueller G
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2021 Mar; 53(2):246-254. PubMed ID: 33555110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and Efficiency of Machine Learning-Assisted Risk-of-Bias Assessments in "Real-World" Systematic Reviews : A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.
Arno A; Thomas J; Wallace B; Marshall IJ; McKenzie JE; Elliott JH
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Jul; 175(7):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 35635850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials.
Marshall IJ; Kuiper J; Wallace BC
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Jan; 23(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 26104742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a prospective cross-sectional evaluation of the RobotReviewer machine learning tool.
Gates A; Vandermeer B; Hartling L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 96():54-62. PubMed ID: 29289761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A
Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Bilandzic A; Fitzpatrick T; Rosella L; Henry D
PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987. PubMed ID: 27046153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Creating efficiencies in the extraction of data from randomized trials: a prospective evaluation of a machine learning and text mining tool.
Gates A; Gates M; Sim S; Elliott SA; Pillay J; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34399684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of bias over time in updates of Cochrane oral health reviews.
Faggion CM; Aranda L; Pandis N; Alarcón MA; Diaz KT
J Dent; 2019 Jan; 80():63-68. PubMed ID: 30342067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.
Marshall M; Crowther R; Almaraz-Serrano A; Creed F; Sledge W; Kluiter H; Roberts C; Hill E; Wiersma D; Bond GR; Huxley P; Tyrer P
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(21):1-75. PubMed ID: 11532238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of bias assessments for blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane reviews were frequently inadequate.
Barcot O; Boric M; Dosenovic S; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():104-113. PubMed ID: 31132470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usability and sensitivity of the risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials of pharmacist interventions.
Tonin FS; Lopes LA; Rotta I; Bonetti AF; Pontarolo R; Correr CJ; Fernandez-Llimos F
Int J Clin Pharm; 2019 Jun; 41(3):785-792. PubMed ID: 30963446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First Steps Towards a Risk of Bias Corpus of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Dhrangadhariya A; Hilfiker R; Sattelmayer M; Giacomino K; Caliesch R; Elsig S; Naderi N; Müller H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 May; 302():586-590. PubMed ID: 37203753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automating risk of bias assessment for clinical trials.
Marshall IJ; Kuiper J; Wallace BC
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jul; 19(4):1406-12. PubMed ID: 25966488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse.
Hunt GE; Siegfried N; Morley K; Sitharthan T; Cleary M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; (10):CD001088. PubMed ID: 24092525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane.
Flemyng E; Moore TH; Boutron I; Higgins JP; Hróbjartsson A; Nejstgaard CH; Dwan K
BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Aug; 28(4):260-266. PubMed ID: 36693715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
