157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31068180)
21. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound.
Martins WP; Barra DA; Gallarreta FM; Nastri CO; Filho FM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 19148891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section.
Cheung VY
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2005 Jul; 27(7):674-81. PubMed ID: 16100622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ultrasonic assessment has high sensitivity for pregnant women with previous cesarean section occurring uterine dehiscence and rupture: A STARD-compliant article.
Cui X; Wu S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21448. PubMed ID: 32756164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to assess the thickness of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean section.
Nagy Afifi A; Ahmed Taymour M; Mamdouh El-Khayat W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():145-151. PubMed ID: 35203047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Utility of multiparametric MRI in Caesarean section scar characterization and preoperative prediction of scar dehiscence: a prospective study.
Kumar I; Verma A; Matah M; Satpathy G
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jul; 58(7):890-896. PubMed ID: 27799572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurement of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness to Detect Uterine Scar Defect: Comparison of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Marchant I; Lessard L; Bergeron C; Jastrow N; Gauthier R; Girard M; Guerby P; Vachon-Marceau C; Maheux-Lacroix S; Bujold E
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jul; 42(7):1491-1496. PubMed ID: 36598096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Does Lower Uterine Segment Thickness Measurement Improve Birth Planning After Previous Cesarean Section?].
Schmitz J; Stepan H; Schrey-Petersen S; Hoffmann J
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2019 Dec; 223(6):350-358. PubMed ID: 31163458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to measure thickness of the lower uterine segment at term.
Marasinghe JP; Senanayake H; Randeniya C; Seneviratne HR; Arambepola C; Devlieger R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 19682683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Factors associated with lower uterine segment thickness near term in women with previous caesarean section.
Bérubé L; Arial M; Gagnon G; Brassard N; Boutin A; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jun; 33(6):581-7. PubMed ID: 21846447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sonographic evaluation of the wall thickness of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean section.
Tanik A; Ustun C; Cil E; Arslan A
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Sep; 24(7):355-7. PubMed ID: 8873858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Second-trimester sonographic comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without a previous cesarean delivery.
Sambaziotis H; Conway C; Figueroa R; Elimian A; Garry D
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Jul; 23(7):907-11; quiz 913-4. PubMed ID: 15292558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effective anatomical and functional status of the lower uterine segment at term: estimating the risk of uterine dehiscence by ultrasound.
Gizzo S; Zambon A; Saccardi C; Patrelli TS; Di Gangi S; Carrozzini M; Bertocco A; Capobianco G; D'Antona D; Nardelli GB
Fertil Steril; 2013 Feb; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 23127591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lower uterine segment thickness assessed by transvaginal ultrasound before labor induction: reproducibility analysis and relationship with delivery outcome.
Del Campo A; Aiartzaguena A; Suárez B; Rodríguez A; Rodríguez L; Burgos J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 61(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 35802514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correlations between sonographically measured and actual incision site thickness of lower uterine segment after repeated caesarean section.
Indraccolo U; Scutiero G; Matteo M; Mastricci AL; Barone I; Greco P
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 25909490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sonographic prediction of scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean section.
Sharma C; Surya M; Soni A; Soni PK; Verma A; Verma S
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2015 Apr; 65(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 25883440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A standardized approach for the assessment of the lower uterine segment at first trimester by transvaginal ultrasound: a flash study.
Kuleva M; Castaing O; Fries N; Bernard JP; Bussières L; Fontanges M; Moeglin D; Salomon LJ
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(9):1376-81. PubMed ID: 26043645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of Changes in the Cesarean Scar and Uterus Between One and Two Years after Cesarean Section Using 3D T2w SPACE MRI.
Qi YF; He YL; Ding N; Ma LK; Qian TY; Li Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY
Chin Med Sci J; 2022 Jun; 37(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 35796339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
