These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31069388)
21. Short-term outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease. Louie BE; Farivar AS; Shultz D; Brennan C; Vallières E; Aye RW Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 98(2):498-504; discussion 504-5. PubMed ID: 24961840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: EFFECTIVE, BUT POSTOPERATIVE DYSPHAGIA AND RISK OF EROSION SHOULD NOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Valinoti AC; Angeramo CA; Dreifuss N; Herbella FAM; Schlottmann F Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2024; 36():e1781. PubMed ID: 38451590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Warren HF; Brown LM; Mihura M; Farivar AS; Aye RW; Louie BE Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):405-412. PubMed ID: 28664433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies. Asti E; Aiolfi A; Lazzari V; Sironi A; Porta M; Bonavina L Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):323-330. PubMed ID: 30022361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic anterior versus posterior fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Broeders JA; Roks DJ; Ahmed Ali U; Draaisma WA; Smout AJ; Hazebroek EJ Ann Surg; 2011 Jul; 254(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21543968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative trial of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication. Sheu EG; Nau P; Nath B; Kuo B; Rattner DW Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):505-9. PubMed ID: 25012804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Medium-term outcomes after magnetic sphincter augmentation vs. fundoplication for reflux disease due to hiatal hernia: a propensity-score matched comparison in 282 patients. Ibach MJ; Dahlke PM; Wiegrebe S; Hentschel F; Siemssen B Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; 38(9):5068-5075. PubMed ID: 39014181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Favorable Result after Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation: Single-Institution Experience with More than 500 Patients. Ayazi S; Zheng P; Zaidi AH; Chovanec K; Salvitti M; Newhams K; Hoppo T; Jobe BA J Am Coll Surg; 2020 May; 230(5):733-743. PubMed ID: 32081749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center. Bonavina L; Saino G; Bona D; Sironi A; Lazzari V J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Oct; 217(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 23856355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: laparoscopic or robotic approach? Maharsi S; Lipham JC; Houghton CC Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36484296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective treatment for atypical symptoms caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ward MA; Ebrahim A; Kopita J; Arviso L; Ogola GO; Buckmaster B; Leeds SG Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4909-4915. PubMed ID: 31792691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: pros and cons. Sterris JA; Dunn CP; Bildzukewicz NA; Lipham JC Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 36(4):323-328. PubMed ID: 32398565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]