These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31069654)

  • 21. Simultaneous removal of NOx and SO
    Cui R; Ma S; Yang B; Li S; Pei T; Li J; Wang J; Sun S; Mi C
    Waste Manag; 2020 May; 109():65-74. PubMed ID: 32388404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Synergistic removal of particles, SO
    Zhang H; Dong Y; Lai Y; Zhang H; Zhang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jun; 28(21):27273-27282. PubMed ID: 33506416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abatement of SO2-NOx binary gas mixtures using a ferruginous active absorbent: Part I. Synergistic effects and mechanism.
    Han Y; Li X; Fan M; Russell AG; Zhao Y; Cao C; Zhang N; Jiang G
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Apr; 30():55-64. PubMed ID: 25872709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigations on fly-ash and soil samples in the environment of a coal-fired power plant.
    Glöbel B; Andres C
    Sci Total Environ; 1985 Oct; 45():63-7. PubMed ID: 4081767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative studies of carbon capture onto coal fly ash zeolites Na-X and Na-Ca-X.
    Boycheva S; Zgureva D; Lazarova H; Popova M
    Chemosphere; 2021 May; 271():129505. PubMed ID: 33450419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide on viability and morphology of oak pollen.
    Ouyang Y; Xu Z; Fan E; Li Y; Zhang L
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2016 Jan; 6(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 26332319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of gas-particle partition of dioxins in flue gas II: estimation of gas-particle partition of dioxins in dust-rich flue gas by parallel sampling with different conditions.
    Yokohama N; Otaka H; Nakata M
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 May; 153(1-2):404-11. PubMed ID: 18180105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An alternative to additional SO3 injection for fly ash conditioning.
    Bayless DJ; Khan AR; Tanneer S; Birru R
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Feb; 50(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 10680345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Regenerable cobalt oxide loaded magnetosphere catalyst from fly ash for mercury removal in coal combustion flue gas.
    Yang J; Zhao Y; Zhang J; Zheng C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14837-43. PubMed ID: 25403026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contribution of SO2 sorption on particulate surface to the air pollution level in the vicinity of coal-fired power plants.
    Matyniak Z
    Sci Total Environ; 1989 Jul; 83(1-2):173-9. PubMed ID: 2781265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Removal of fly-ash and dust particulate matters from syngas produced by gasification of coal by using a multi-stage dual-flow sieve plate wet scrubber.
    Kurella S; Meikap BC
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2016 Aug; 51(10):870-6. PubMed ID: 27230635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variation of nitrate and nitrite in condensable particulate matter from coal-fired power plants under the simulated rapid condensing conditions.
    Sheng Z; Zhang F; Wu T; Yang L
    Chemosphere; 2023 Mar; 318():137934. PubMed ID: 36702403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhanced effect of in-situ generated ammonium salts aerosols on the removal of NOx from simulated flue gas.
    Tseng CH; Keener TC; Lee JY; Khang SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Aug; 35(15):3219-24. PubMed ID: 11506008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of Coal-Fired Fly Ash on Measurement Error of NO
    Chen W; Zhou H; Wu S; Liao D
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 38339616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Characteristics of water soluble inorganic ions in fine particles emitted from coal-fired power plants].
    Duan L; Ma ZZ; Li Z; Jiang JK; Ye ZX
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1117-22. PubMed ID: 25929084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distributions of SO
    Subba JR; Thammakhet C; Thavarungkul P; Kanatharana P
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2016 Dec; 51(14):1278-1287. PubMed ID: 27533342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inhibition of the de novo synthesis of PCDD/Fs on model fly ash by sludge drying gases.
    Chen T; Zhan MX; Lin XQ; Li XD; Lu SY; Yan JH; Buekens A; Cen KF
    Chemosphere; 2014 Nov; 114():226-32. PubMed ID: 25113206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. As, Hg, and Se flue gas sampling in a coal-fired power plant and their fate during coal combustion.
    Otero-Rey JR; López-Vilariño JM; Moreda-Piñeiro J; Alonso-Rodríguez E; Muniategui-Lorenzo S; López-Mahía P; Prada-Rodríguez D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5262-7. PubMed ID: 14655716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Airborne crystalline silica concentrations at coal-fired power plants associated with coal fly ash.
    Hicks J; Yager J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Aug; 3(8):448-55. PubMed ID: 16862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surface modification of fly ash by non-thermal air plasma for elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas.
    Shi M; Luo G; Zhu H; Zou R; Hu J; Xu Y; Yao H
    Environ Technol; 2021 Jan; 42(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 31169458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.