These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31069943)

  • 1. Comparing the sterility and visibility of surgical marking pens available in Australia.
    O'Bryan E; Pollock M; Joseph S
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Sep; 89(9):1114-1118. PubMed ID: 31069943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing clarity and erasability of commercially available pens for surgical site marking: a comparative study in human volunteers.
    Sim FC; Angadi D; Jarvis GE; Porteous M
    Patient Saf Surg; 2016; 10():11. PubMed ID: 26997976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visibility of surgical site marking: a prospective randomized trial of two skin preparation solutions.
    Thakkar SC; Mears SC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jan; 94(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22257994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical site marking does not affect sterility.
    Rooney J; Khoo OK; Higgs AR; Small TJ; Bell S
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Aug; 78(8):688-9. PubMed ID: 18796029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The risk of cross-infection when marking surgical patients prior to surgery - review of two types of marking pens.
    Ballal MS; Shah N; Ballal M; O'Donoghue M; Pegg DJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Apr; 89(3):226-8. PubMed ID: 17394703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which pen? A comparative study of surgical site markers.
    Bathla S; Nevins EJ; Moori PL; Vimalachandran D
    J Perioper Pract; 2018; 28(1-2):21-26. PubMed ID: 29376785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sterility of surgical site marking.
    Cronen G; Ringus V; Sigle G; Ryu J
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Oct; 87(10):2193-5. PubMed ID: 16203882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staining intraoperative topical solutions with fluorescein: enhancing the safety of sinus surgery.
    Yao WC; Regone RM; Takashima M
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2015 Sep; 5(9):870-4. PubMed ID: 25856496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bacterial Contamination of a Marking Pen in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Ridley TJ; Rud CT; Krych AJ; Macalena JA
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2018 May; 6(5):2325967118772043. PubMed ID: 29796399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The surgical marking pen: a comparative study.
    Stromberg BV
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1987 Jul; 80(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 3602148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current practice on preoperative correct site surgical marking.
    Masud D; Moore A; Massouh F
    J Perioper Pract; 2010 Jun; 20(6):210-4. PubMed ID: 20586361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical site markers: potential source of infection.
    Driessche AM
    Orthop Nurs; 2012; 31(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 23168939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical site marking will not affect sterility of the surgical field.
    Zhao X; Chen J; Fang XQ; Fan SW
    Med Hypotheses; 2009 Sep; 73(3):319-20. PubMed ID: 19398281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduced chondrocyte viability is associated with the use of surgical marker pen ink.
    Getgood A; McNamara I; Kili S; Bhullar T; Henson F
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jun; 39(6):1270-4. PubMed ID: 21335346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can skin marker pens, used preoperatively to prevent wrong-site surgeries, transfer bacteria?
    Burton C; Rennie R; Turnbull L; Spady D; Forgie SE
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 20055641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ink surgical marker pen is damaging to tendon cells.
    Franklin SL; Jayadev C; Poulsen R; Hulley P; Price A
    Bone Joint Res; 2012 Mar; 1(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 23610669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience of wrong site surgery and surgical marking practices among clinicians in the UK.
    Giles SJ; Rhodes P; Clements G; Cook GA; Hayton R; Maxwell MJ; Sheldon TA; Wright J
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Oct; 15(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 17074875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK): effect of nontoxic gentian violet marking pen on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using vital dye assay.
    Ide T; Yoo SH; Kymionis GD; Perez VL; Goldman JM; O'Brien TP
    Cornea; 2008 Jun; 27(5):562-4. PubMed ID: 18520506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localization of sentinel nodes in breast cancer: novel method and device to help pen marking of active nodes during gamma camera imaging.
    Laasanen MS; Heikkinen JO; Saarakkala S; Paajanen H
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):N49-54. PubMed ID: 15798326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes of patients and care providers toward a surgical site marking policy.
    Goldberg AE; Harnish JL; Stegienko S; Urbach DR
    Surg Innov; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19666933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.