These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31070432)

  • 1. The outcome predictability bias is evident in overt attention.
    Griffiths O; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 31070432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning.
    Beesley T; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 20718547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effect.
    Griffiths O; Livesey E; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30604992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome predictability biases cued search.
    Griffiths O; Erlinger M; Beesley T; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1215-1223. PubMed ID: 29389193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learned changes in outcome associability.
    Quigley MC; Eatherington CJ; Haselgrove M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):209-221. PubMed ID: 28627301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the automaticity of an attentional bias towards predictive cues in human associative learning.
    Luque D; Molinero S; Jevtović M; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):762-780. PubMed ID: 31826714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of cue predictiveness during intentional and incidental associative learning: A time-frequency study.
    Do Carmo-Blanco N; Allen JJB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():80-87. PubMed ID: 31254544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dorsolateral striatum is critical for the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability.
    Asem JS; Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 42(5):2203-13. PubMed ID: 26108257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and the role of attention in associative learning.
    Mutter SA; Holder JM; Mashburn CA; Luna CM
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 30058825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention biases in the inverse base-rate effect persist into new learning.
    Don HJ; Livesey EJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Apr; 74(4):669-681. PubMed ID: 33327859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learned predictiveness models predict opposite attention biases in the inverse base-rate effect.
    Don HJ; Beesley T; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):143-162. PubMed ID: 30869934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The redundancy effect in human causal learning: No evidence for changes in selective attention.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 28695765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beer? Over here! Examining attentional bias towards alcoholic and appetitive stimuli in a visual search eye-tracking task.
    Pennington CR; Qureshi AW; Monk RL; Greenwood K; Heim D
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Dec; 236(12):3465-3476. PubMed ID: 31286155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conditioned anticipatory outcome searching in humans.
    Nelson JB; Navarro A; Sanjuan MDC
    Behav Processes; 2019 Jul; 164():237-251. PubMed ID: 31100330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The onset of uncertainty facilitates the learning of new associations by increasing attention to cues.
    Easdale LC; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 28766369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidance of spatial attention during associative learning: Contributions of predictability and intention to learn.
    Do Carmo Blanco N; Allen JJB
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Aug; 55(8):e13077. PubMed ID: 29572912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of prediction in learned predictiveness.
    Eatherington CJ; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(3):203-221. PubMed ID: 35878082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):116-32. PubMed ID: 24099508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional bias to betel quid cues: An eye tracking study.
    Shen B; Chiu MC; Li SH; Huang GJ; Liu LJ; Ho MC
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2016 Sep; 30(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 27631615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reward timing information on cue associability are mediated by amygdala central nucleus.
    Wheeler DS; Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 125(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21319887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.