These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31070432)

  • 21. Prediction and uncertainty in associative learning: examining controlled and automatic components of learned attentional biases.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1485-1503. PubMed ID: 27174735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive learning, prediction errors, and attention: evidence from event-related potentials and eye tracking.
    Wills AJ; Lavric A; Croft GS; Hodgson TL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):843-54. PubMed ID: 17488208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
    Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of higher versus lower threat contexts on pain-related attention biases: An eye-tracking study.
    Jackson T; Su L; Wang Y
    Eur J Pain; 2018 Jul; 22(6):1113-1123. PubMed ID: 29364566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction.
    Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Johnson AM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23316975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Theory protection in associative learning: Humans maintain certain beliefs in a manner that violates prediction error.
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 31556642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcome predictability biases learning.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ; Bethmont A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 25706542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attention to faces and gaze-following in social anxiety: preliminary evidence from a naturalistic eye-tracking investigation.
    Gregory NJ; Bolderston H; Antolin JV
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):931-942. PubMed ID: 30187816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learned predictiveness and outcome predictability effects are not simply two sides of the same coin.
    Thorwart A; Livesey EJ; Wilhelm F; Liu W; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(4):341-365. PubMed ID: 28981309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Secondary visual cortex is critical to the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability in rats.
    Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 44(2):1870-7. PubMed ID: 27225533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of selection history in the learned predictiveness effect.
    Balea P; Molinero S; Vadillo MA; Luque D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Oct; 50(10):1010-1022. PubMed ID: 39172367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does learning history shape the associability of outcomes? Further tests of the outcome predictability effect.
    Liu W; Livesey EJ; Lachnit H; Don HJ; Thorwart A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243434. PubMed ID: 33338047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Eye movements reveal mechanisms underlying attentional biases towards threat.
    Sagliano L; D'Olimpio F; Taglialatela Scafati I; Trojano L
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Nov; 30(7):1344-51. PubMed ID: 26212202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Oculomotor capture is influenced by expected reward value but (maybe) not predictiveness.
    Le Pelley ME; Pearson D; Porter A; Yee H; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 28375688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surprise-induced enhancements in the associability of Pavlovian cues facilitate learning across behavior systems.
    Márquez I; Loewinger G; Vargas JP; López JC; Díaz E; Esber GR
    Behav Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 136(4):285-292. PubMed ID: 35175064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Explaining learned predictiveness: Roles of attention and integration of associative structures.
    Rodríguez G; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30945925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Previously acquired cue-outcome structural knowledge guides new learning: Evidence from the retroactive-interference-between-cues effect.
    Luque D; Morís J; López FJ; Cobos PL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):916-931. PubMed ID: 28405958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 21319915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional instructions modulate differential context-switch effects after short and long training in human predictive learning.
    Callejas-Aguilera JE; Cubillas CP; Rosas JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):474-484. PubMed ID: 31081658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.