These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31072186)

  • 1. Intrapartum cardiotocogram monitoring between obstetricians and computer analysis.
    Magawa S; Tanaka H; Furuhashi F; Maki S; Nii M; Toriyabe K; Kondo E; Ikeda T
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(5):787-793. PubMed ID: 31072186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a novel computerized analysis program and visual interpretation of cardiotocography.
    Chen CY; Yu C; Chang CC; Lin CW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e112296. PubMed ID: 25437442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment.
    Todros T; Preve CU; Plazzotta C; Biolcati M; Lombardo P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Sep; 68(1-2):83-6. PubMed ID: 8886686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability in cardiotocography interpretation - impact of extended on-site education in addition to web-based learning: an observational study.
    Gyllencreutz E; Hulthén Varli I; Lindqvist PG; Holzmann M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 28052320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver variation in the assessment of fetal heart rate recordings.
    Donker DK; van Geijn HP; Hasman A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Nov; 52(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 8119470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.
    Bracero LA; Roshanfekr D; Byrne DW
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10914628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver reliability to interpret intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Does a standardized algorithm improve agreement among clinicians?
    Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo GF; Bogani G; Casarin J; Agosti M; Ghezzi F
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 35(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 25254299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-observer reliability of 4 fetal heart rate classifications.
    Garabedian C; Butruille L; Drumez E; Servan Schreiber E; Bartolo S; Bleu G; Mesdag V; Deruelle P; De Jonckheere J; Houfflin-Debarge V
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 28403968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and interobserver variability of intrapartum cardiotocography: a multicenter study comparing the FIGO classification with computer analysis software.
    Schiermeier S; Westhof G; Leven A; Hatzmann H; Reinhard J
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 21921568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional and computerized antepartum telecardiotocography. Experienced and inexperienced observers versus computerized analysis.
    Di Lieto A; Giani U; Campanile M; De Falco M; Scaramellino M; Papa R
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2003; 55(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 12624550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver agreement in analysis of cardiotocograms recorded during trial of labor after cesarean.
    Caning MM; Thisted DLA; Amer-Wählin I; Laier GH; Krebs L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3778-3783. PubMed ID: 29724142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. eCTG: an automatic procedure to extract digital cardiotocographic signals from digital images.
    Sbrollini A; Agostinelli A; Marcantoni I; Morettini M; Burattini L; Di Nardo F; Fioretti S; Burattini L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():133-139. PubMed ID: 29428065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation.
    Palomäki O; Luukkaala T; Luoto R; Tuimala R
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 16856819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of a new cardiotocography analysis program.
    Chen CY; Chen JC; Yu C; Lin CW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2567-70. PubMed ID: 19965213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
    Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Relationship between computerized cardiotocography and perinatal outcomes].
    Liu W; Li X; Tang D
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16134517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective computerized fetal heart rate analysis.
    Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A; Pereira-Leite L; Garrido A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Aug; 62(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 9749885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.