These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation. Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver reliability to interpret intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Does a standardized algorithm improve agreement among clinicians? Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo GF; Bogani G; Casarin J; Agosti M; Ghezzi F J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 35(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 25254299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra- and interobserver variability of intrapartum cardiotocography: a multicenter study comparing the FIGO classification with computer analysis software. Schiermeier S; Westhof G; Leven A; Hatzmann H; Reinhard J Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 21921568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional and computerized antepartum telecardiotocography. Experienced and inexperienced observers versus computerized analysis. Di Lieto A; Giani U; Campanile M; De Falco M; Scaramellino M; Papa R Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2003; 55(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 12624550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver agreement in analysis of cardiotocograms recorded during trial of labor after cesarean. Caning MM; Thisted DLA; Amer-Wählin I; Laier GH; Krebs L J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3778-3783. PubMed ID: 29724142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. eCTG: an automatic procedure to extract digital cardiotocographic signals from digital images. Sbrollini A; Agostinelli A; Marcantoni I; Morettini M; Burattini L; Di Nardo F; Fioretti S; Burattini L Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():133-139. PubMed ID: 29428065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation. Palomäki O; Luukkaala T; Luoto R; Tuimala R J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 16856819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of a new cardiotocography analysis program. Chen CY; Chen JC; Yu C; Lin CW Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2567-70. PubMed ID: 19965213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN. Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Relationship between computerized cardiotocography and perinatal outcomes]. Liu W; Li X; Tang D Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16134517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]