These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31073253)

  • 1. Effects of technology assumptions on US power sector capacity, generation and emissions projections: Results from the EMF 32 Model Intercomparison Project.
    Creason JR; Bistline JE; Hodson EL; Murray BC; Rossmann CG
    Energy Econ; 2018; 73():290-306. PubMed ID: 31073253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electric sector policy, technological change, and U.S. emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project.
    Bistline JE; Hodson E; Rossmann CG; Creason J; Murray B; Barron AR
    Energy Econ; 2018; 73():307-325. PubMed ID: 31073254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of CO
    Abdallah L; El-Shennawy T
    EuroMediterr J Environ Integr; 2020; 5(3):49. PubMed ID: 32984503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of natural gas in reaching net-zero emissions in the electric sector.
    Bistline JET; Young DT
    Nat Commun; 2022 Aug; 13(1):4743. PubMed ID: 35961986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal investment in electric generating capacity under climate policy.
    Cornelis van Kooten G; Mokhtarzadeh F
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():66-72. PubMed ID: 30468959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Market Sensitivity of Solar-Fossil Hybrid Electricity Generation to Price, Efficiency, Policy, and Fuel Projections.
    Brown KE; Loughlin DH
    Clean Technol Environ Policy; 2019; 21(3):591-604. PubMed ID: 31156356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Least-cost targets and avoided fossil fuel capacity in India's pursuit of renewable energy.
    Deshmukh R; Phadke A; Callaway DS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Mar; 118(13):. PubMed ID: 33753476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implications of variations in renewable cost projections for electric sector decarbonization in the United States.
    Bistline JET; Bedilion R; Goteti NS; Kern N
    iScience; 2022 Jun; 25(6):104392. PubMed ID: 35663024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Open Source Energy System Modeling Using Break-Even Costs to Inform State-Level Policy: A North Carolina Case Study.
    Li B; Thomas J; de Queiroz AR; DeCarolis JF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 54(2):665-676. PubMed ID: 31834995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decarbonization of the Indian electricity sector: Technology choices and policy trade-offs.
    Rudnick I; Duenas-Martinez P; Botterud A; Papageorgiou DJ; Mignone BK; Rajagopalan S; Harper MR; Ganesan K
    iScience; 2022 Apr; 25(4):104017. PubMed ID: 35359809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of carbon footprint effect of renewable power plants regarding energy production: A case study of a city in Turkey.
    Kerem A
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Mar; 72(3):294-307. PubMed ID: 35030055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The global and national energy systems techno-economic (GNESTE) database: Cost and performance data for electricity generation and storage technologies.
    Hatton L; Johnson N; Dixon L; Mosongo B; De Kock S; Marquard A; Howells M; Staffell I
    Data Brief; 2024 Aug; 55():110669. PubMed ID: 39234065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CO
    Wang J; Song C; Yuan R
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 773():145026. PubMed ID: 33582330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. China's power transition under the global 1.5 °C target: preliminary feasibility study and prospect.
    Xu Y; Yang K; Yuan J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(13):15113-15129. PubMed ID: 32064579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Projected future European power sector water usage across power scenarios and corresponding trends in water availability.
    Mapes AS; Larsen MAD
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 343():118208. PubMed ID: 37291019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opportunity for offshore wind to reduce future demand for coal-fired power plants in China with consequent savings in emissions of CO2.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Chen X; Kang C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14764-71. PubMed ID: 25409413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada.
    Zhang Y; Habibi S; MacLean HL
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.