These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31073678)

  • 1. [Application of rebound self-tonometry for measurements in a supine position].
    Amani A; Rosentreter A; Dietlein T; Hoerster R
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Aug; 116(8):766-770. PubMed ID: 31073678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
    Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
    J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Intraocular pressure measurement during the day and night for glaucoma patients and normal controls using Goldmann and Perkins applanation tonometry].
    Wozniak K; Köller AU; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pillunat LE
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 Dec; 103(12):1027-31. PubMed ID: 17048019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
    Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: rebound versus goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Fuest M; Mamas N; Walter P; Plange N
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Sep; 39(9):902-7. PubMed ID: 24588266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
    Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
    Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Dabasia PL; Lawrenson JG; Murdoch IE
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 100(8):1139-43. PubMed ID: 26614630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of intraocular pressure values obtained using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a handheld version of applanation resonance tonometer: A preliminary report.
    Mulak M; Czak WA; Mimier M; Kaczmarek R
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Apr; 27(4):481-485. PubMed ID: 29558028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rebound tonometer: ideal tonometer for measurement of accurate intraocular pressure.
    Suman S; Agrawal A; Pal VK; Pratap VB
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec; 23(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 23429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
    Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness.
    Poostchi A; Mitchell R; Nicholas S; Purdie G; Wells A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 37(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19788665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of manual eyelid manipulation on intraocular pressure measurement by rebound tonometry.
    Baek SU; Ha A; Kim YK; Jeoung JW; Park KH
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 102(11):1515-1519. PubMed ID: 29420194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.