BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31073859)

  • 1. Evaluation of single-view contrast-enhanced mammography as novel reading strategy: a non-inferiority feasibility study.
    Lobbes MBI; Hecker J; Houben IPL; Pluymakers R; Jeukens C; Laji UC; Gommers S; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6211-6219. PubMed ID: 31073859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use.
    Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJ; Meens-Koreman SD; van Stiphout RSA; Timmermans SMEC; Duvivier KM; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22224. PubMed ID: 34782698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.
    Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F
    Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme.
    Lobbes MB; Lalji U; Houwers J; Nijssen EC; Nelemans PJ; van Roozendaal L; Smidt ML; Heuts E; Wildberger JE
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1668-76. PubMed ID: 24696228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation.
    Fallenberg EM; Schmitzberger FF; Amer H; Ingold-Heppner B; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Engelken F; Mann RM; Renz DM; Bick U; Hamm B; Dromain C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2752-2764. PubMed ID: 27896471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy?
    Uhlig J; Fischer U; Biggemann L; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3141-3148. PubMed ID: 30488110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
    Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
    Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A potential exclusion diagnosis modality in dense breast patients.
    Qin Y; Liu Y; Zhang X; Zhao S; Zhong H; Huang J; Yu J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Apr; 9(8):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 32074407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study.
    Kim G; Phillips J; Cole E; Brook A; Mehta T; Slanetz P; Fishman MDC; Karimova E; Mehta R; Lotfi P; Resteghini N; Raj S; Dialani V
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 31092346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
    Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Rasmussen R; Behmer C; Zackrisson S; Ryden L
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 32438917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions.
    Pinker K; Bickel H; Helbich TH; Gruber S; Dubsky P; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Bago-Horvath Z; Weber M; Trattnig S; Bogner W
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 23504036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the applicability of BI-RADS® MRI for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Travieso-Aja MM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Luzardo OP
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(6):477-488. PubMed ID: 31262509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.