These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31074631)

  • 1. Exploring relationships between observed activation rates and functional attributes of lane departure prevention.
    Reagan IJ; Cicchino JB; Montalbano CJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):424-430. PubMed ID: 31074631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
    Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observed activation status of lane departure warning and forward collision warning of Honda vehicles at dealership service centers.
    Reagan IJ; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):827-32. PubMed ID: 26891465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Residual road departure crashes after full deployment of LDW and LDP systems.
    Riexinger LE; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S177-S181. PubMed ID: 31381442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of lane departure warning on police-reported crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    J Safety Res; 2018 Sep; 66():61-70. PubMed ID: 30121111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
    Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The safety potential of enhanced lateral vehicle positioning.
    Sternlund S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 33556264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual and steering behaviours during lane departures: a longitudinal study of interactions between lane departure warning system, driving task and driving experience.
    Navarro J; Reynaud E; Pelerin M; Ouimet MC; Gabaude C; Schnebelen D
    Ergonomics; 2024 Jan; 67(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 37074777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential occupant injury reduction in the U.S. vehicle fleet for lane departure warning-equipped vehicles in single-vehicle crashes.
    Kusano K; Gorman TI; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S157-64. PubMed ID: 25307382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of false warnings on partial and full lane departure warnings effectiveness and acceptance in car driving.
    Navarro J; Yousfi E; Deniel J; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Ergonomics; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 26916010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of lane departure warning systems-A reduction in real-world passenger car injury crashes.
    Sternlund S; Strandroth J; Rizzi M; Lie A; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Feb; 18(2):225-229. PubMed ID: 27624313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Field effectiveness of general motors advanced driver assistance and headlighting systems.
    Leslie AJ; Kiefer RJ; Meitzner MR; Flannagan CA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106275. PubMed ID: 34242861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The safety potential of lane departure warning systems-A descriptive real-world study of fatal lane departure passenger car crashes in Sweden.
    Sternlund S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S18-S23. PubMed ID: 28394639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.