306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31075253)
1. Is Panoramic Imaging Equivalent to Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Classifying Impacted Lower Third Molars?
Brasil DM; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Maria de Almeida S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 77(10):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 31075253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the Winter or Pell and Gregory Classification System Indicate the Apical Position of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars?
Khojastepour L; Khaghaninejad MS; Hasanshahi R; Forghani M; Ahrari F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 77(11):2222.e1-2222.e9. PubMed ID: 31306615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the relationship between gonial angle and impacted mandibular third molar teeth.
Demirel O; Akbulut A
Anat Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 95(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 31701372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study between multilayer and conventional panoramic radiography.
Machado AH; Freitas DQ; Fontenele RC; Farias-Gomes A; Francesquini Júnior L; Ambrosano GMB
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Nov; 27(11):6451-6460. PubMed ID: 37728617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation.
Patel PS; Shah JS; Dudhia BB; Butala PB; Jani YV; Macwan RS
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 32246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
Oenning AC; Neves FS; Alencar PN; Prado RF; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Aug; 72(8):1444-55. PubMed ID: 24856956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis.
Deppe H; Ritschl LM; Kleinschmidt J; Wagenpfeil S; Sculean A
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(6):470-477. PubMed ID: 31086860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal bone loss in the second molar related to impacted mandibular third molars: comparison between panoramic images and cone beam computed tomography.
Dias MJ; Franco A; Junqueira JL; Fayad FT; Pereira PH; Oenning AC
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 May; 25(3):e395-e402. PubMed ID: 32271319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography.
Wang D; He X; Wang Y; Li Z; Zhu Y; Sun C; Ye J; Jiang H; Cheng J
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 27316639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic Evaluation of Impacted Third Mandibular Molar According to the Classification of Winter, Pell and Gregory in a Sample of Cameroonian Population.
Jacques E; Ebogo M; Eng YC; Donald N; Odile Z
Ethiop J Health Sci; 2023 Sep; 33(5):851-858. PubMed ID: 38784512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of second molar external root resorption caused by mandibular third molars: a CBCT study.
Lacerda-Santos JT; Granja GL; Bento PM; Araújo-Filho JCWP; Melo DP; Santos JA
Gen Dent; 2023; 71(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 36592361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography.
Freire BB; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos KF; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 31072782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21507612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationships between third-molar juxta-apical radiolucencies and mandibular canals in panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images.
Kapila R; Harada N; Araki K; Sano T; Goto TK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 May; 117(5):640-644. PubMed ID: 24725991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT.
Matzen LH; Schropp L; Spin-Neto R; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jan; 46(1):20160330. PubMed ID: 27681861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pattern of mandibular third molar impaction: A cross-sectional study in northeast of Iran.
Eshghpour M; Nezadi A; Moradi A; Shamsabadi RM; Rezaei NM; Nejat A
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(6):673-7. PubMed ID: 25385900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a relationship between third-molar impaction types and the dimensional/angular measurement values of posterior mandible according to Pell & Gregory/Winter Classification?
Gümrükçü Z; Balaban E; Karabağ M
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jan; 37(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 31925627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
