364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31075445)
61. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery.
Laterza RM; Uccella S; Casarin J; Morosi C; Serati M; Koelbl H; Ghezzi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):547-52. PubMed ID: 26807638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Laparotomy conversion rate of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in a consecutive series without case selection.
Park JY; Nam JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):3030-5. PubMed ID: 24748163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Efficacy of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Duan D; Liu B; Li L
J BUON; 2020; 25(2):743-749. PubMed ID: 32521862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: description of the technique and patients' outcome.
Kavallaris A; Hornemann A; Chalvatzas N; Luedders D; Diedrich K; Bohlmann MK
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 20701958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.
Nam JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
Ann Oncol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):903-11. PubMed ID: 21841155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.
Kim NR; Kim SI; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():224-230. PubMed ID: 37229880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A prospective case-control study on the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgery-related outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Serati M; Di Naro E; Casarin J; Marconi N; Sturla D; Donadello N; Ghezzi F
Anticancer Res; 2014 Oct; 34(10):5703-8. PubMed ID: 25275077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee HJ; Hong DG; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Feb; 28(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 108(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23737035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].
He HY; Yang ZJ; Zeng DY; Yao DS; Fan JT; Zhao RF; Zhang JQ; Hu XX; Lin Z; Jiang YM; Li L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 28635237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
Cao T; Feng Y; Huang Q; Wan T; Liu J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Dec; 25(12):990-8. PubMed ID: 26584414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
