These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31075748)

  • 1. Effects of loading rate on the of mechanical behavior of the femur in falling condition.
    Askarinejad S; Johnson JE; Rahbar N; Troy KL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Aug; 96():269-278. PubMed ID: 31075748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip.
    Dragomir-Daescu D; Op Den Buijs J; McEligot S; Dai Y; Entwistle RC; Salas C; Melton LJ; Bennet KE; Khosla S; Amin S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 39(2):742-55. PubMed ID: 21052839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
    Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
    Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonlinear quasi-static finite element simulations predict in vitro strength of human proximal femora assessed in a dynamic sideways fall setup.
    Varga P; Schwiedrzik J; Zysset PK; Fliri-Hofmann L; Widmer D; Gueorguiev B; Blauth M; Windolf M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Apr; 57():116-27. PubMed ID: 26708740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.
    Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Balistreri L; Baruffaldi F; Bordini B; Viceconti M; Albisinni U; Ceccarelli F; Milandri L; Toni A; Taddei F
    Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():71-80. PubMed ID: 25014885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
    Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of test paradigm on loading dynamics during proximal femur fracture tests simulating sideways falls.
    Martel DR; Callaghan JP; Mourtzakis M; Willett TL; Laing AC
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Sep; 157():106631. PubMed ID: 38986216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Previous Damage Accumulation Can Influence Femoral Fracture Strength: A Finite Element Study.
    Haider IT; Frei H
    J Orthop Res; 2019 Oct; 37(10):2197-2203. PubMed ID: 31144729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact loading history modulates hip fracture load and location: A finite element simulation study of the proximal femur in female athletes.
    Abe S; Narra N; Nikander R; Hyttinen J; Kouhia R; Sievänen H
    J Biomech; 2018 Jul; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 29921524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
    Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part II--Nonlinear analysis.
    Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
    J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 1762431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A robust 3D finite element simulation of human proximal femur progressive fracture under stance load with experimental validation.
    Hambli R; Allaoui S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2515-27. PubMed ID: 23864338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femoral fracture load and fracture pattern is accurately predicted using a gradient-enhanced quasi-brittle finite element model.
    Haider IT; Goldak J; Frei H
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 May; 55():1-8. PubMed ID: 29551293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrated remodeling-to-fracture finite element model of human proximal femur behavior.
    Hambli R; Lespessailles E; Benhamou CL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Jan; 17():89-106. PubMed ID: 23122886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
    Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
    J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femur strength predictions by nonlinear homogenized voxel finite element models reflect the microarchitecture of the femoral neck.
    Iori G; Peralta L; Reisinger A; Heyer F; Wyers C; van den Bergh J; Pahr D; Raum K
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 May; 79():60-66. PubMed ID: 32291201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of explicit finite element and mechanical simulation of the proximal femur during dynamic drop-tower testing.
    Ariza O; Gilchrist S; Widmer RP; Guy P; Ferguson SJ; Cripton PA; Helgason B
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 25527888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.