These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
653 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31075801)
1. Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominally Based Flaps: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database. Holoyda KA; Simpson AM; Ye X; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Oct; 35(8):594-601. PubMed ID: 31075801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction using Abdominally Based Flaps: Analysis of 3,310 Cases. Kwok AC; Simpson AM; Ye X; Tatro E; Agarwal JP J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Jan; 35(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 30085346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Versus Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap: Complications and Resource Utilization. Zoghbi Y; Gerth DJ; Tashiro J; Golpanian S; Thaller SR Ann Plast Surg; 2017 May; 78(5):516-520. PubMed ID: 28052051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolving Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Is the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Taking Over? Pien I; Caccavale S; Cheung MC; Butala P; Hughes DB; Ligh C; Zenn MR; Hollenbeck ST Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25180959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Chevray PM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Lee KT; Mun GH Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods. Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mortada H; AlNojaidi TF; AlRabah R; Almohammadi Y; AlKhashan R; Aljaaly H Breast J; 2022; 2022():7857158. PubMed ID: 35847769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Outcomes following Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the DIEP and Pedicled TRAM Flaps: A 12-Year Clinical Retrospective Study and Literature Review. Knox ADC; Ho AL; Leung L; Tashakkor AY; Lennox PA; Van Laeken N; Macadam SA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jul; 138(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26267400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of microvascular breast reconstruction: Cost equivalence of TRAM and DIEP flaps implications in the era of CMS reforms. Foppiani JA; Hernandez Alvarez A; Kim EJ; Escobar-Domingo MJ; Taritsa IC; Schuster KA; Lee D; Ho OA; Rinker B; Lee BT; Lin SJ Microsurgery; 2024 May; 44(4):e31185. PubMed ID: 38716656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction. Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of nine methods of immediate breast reconstruction after resection of localized breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness Markov decision analysis of prospective studies. Klifto KM; Tecce MG; Serletti JM; Kovach SJ Microsurgery; 2022 Jul; 42(5):401-427. PubMed ID: 35355320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgically Treated Hernia following Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Prevalence, Outcomes, and Expenditures. Shubinets V; Fox JP; Sarik JR; Kovach SJ; Fischer JP Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):749-757. PubMed ID: 26910655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]