198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31076165)
1. Implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis with a microlocking implant prosthetic system: A clinical report.
Choi JW; Lee JJ; Bae EB; Huh JB
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 31076165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Newly Designed Screw- and Cement-Retained Prosthesis and Its Abutments.
Heo YK; Lim YJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):612-4. PubMed ID: 26523721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management of a Fractured Multiunit Maxillary Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis with Stripped Abutment Screws Using a Hybrid Cement-Retained and Screw-Retained Design: A 5-Year Follow-Up Clinical Report.
Al Amri MD
J Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 25(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 26713868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different geometric changes in the dental implant abutment body on the amount of residual excess cement and retention in a cemented implant-supported prosthesis.
Negahdari R; Bohlouli S; Yazdani J; Torab A; Dizaj SM
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 34019744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design.
Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14982360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
Chaar MS; Att W; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):697-711. PubMed ID: 21395638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.
Wittneben JG; Joda T; Weber HP; Brägger U
Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 28000276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method for determining the position of the abutment screw of any cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
Figueras-Alvarez O; Real-Voltas F; Cabratosa-Termes J; Roig M
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):846-848. PubMed ID: 32576371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.
Shadid R; Sadaqa N
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 21091343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Prosthesis Retention System for Full-Arch, Fixed, Implant-Supported Prosthesis.
Massad J; Wicks R; Ahuja S; Cagna DR
J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):e912-e916. PubMed ID: 30295369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Current Perspective on Screw-Retained Single-Implant Restorations: A Review of Pertinent Literature.
Priest G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 May; 29(3):161-171. PubMed ID: 28112854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An auxiliary device for screw-retained fixed implant restorations which prevents extrusion of cement into screw-access openings.
Yang Z; Liu M; Liu X; Tan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):178-180. PubMed ID: 32828529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
