BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31076882)

  • 1. Comparative study of nasal septal retainer and nasal packing in patients undergoing septoplasty.
    Fang S; Wei X; Ying L; Zhu L; Cui J; Ma Z; Wang W
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 276(8):2251-2257. PubMed ID: 31076882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid Rhino versus Merocel nasal packs in septal surgery.
    Hesham A; Ghali A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Dec; 125(12):1244-6. PubMed ID: 21854674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of gloved versus ungloved merocel
    Kaur J; Singh M; Kaur I; Singh A; Goyal S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 30417834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Surgicel-wrapped Merocel to reduce pain during the removal of nasal packing.
    Lo WL; Yeh CF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2023; 143(11-12):984-988. PubMed ID: 38134221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of the duration of merocel in a glove finger on postoperative morbidity.
    Celebi S; Caglar E; Develioglu ON; Topak M; Yalcin E; Kulekci M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1232-4. PubMed ID: 23851776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of rapid rhino and merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery.
    Ozcan C; Vayisoglu Y; Kiliç S; Görür K
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(6):826-31. PubMed ID: 19128711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nasal septal packing: which one?
    Acıoğlu E; Edizer DT; Yiğit Ö; Onur F; Alkan Z
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 269(7):1777-81. PubMed ID: 22160143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study between biodegradable nasopore (BNP) and Merocel hemox 10 cm after septo-turbinoplasty procedure.
    Romano A; Salzano G; Dell'Aversana Orabona G; Cama A; Petrocelli M; Piombino P; Schonauer F; Iaconetta G; Salzano FA; Califano L
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2017 Feb; 21(4):669-673. PubMed ID: 28272718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid Rhino versus Merocel nasal packs in septal surgery.
    Stew B; Fishpool SJ; Moorhouse T; Williams H
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Jun; 126(6):651; author reply 651. PubMed ID: 22449802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study on packing with or without Merocel after endoscopic sinus surgery].
    Chen X; Shi Z; Li X; Shan B; Xue T; Qiao L; Chen F
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 50(10):854-7. PubMed ID: 26696482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of duration of merocel in glove finger with tetracaine solution on septoplasty morbidity.
    Çelik Ö; Boyaci Z; Ateşpare A; Develioğlu O; Karaca Ç; Çaglar E; Vural Ç
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):1931-4. PubMed ID: 24220376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam in patients following septoplasty: a prospective randomized trial.
    Yilmaz MS; Guven M; Elicora SS; Kaymaz R
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jan; 148(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 23112275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Merocel versus Nasopore for nasal packing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang J; Cai C; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93959. PubMed ID: 24710428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial on biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam as a packing material after septoplasty.
    Kim YS; Kim YH; Kim NH; Kim SH; Kim KR; Kim KS
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(2):e77-9. PubMed ID: 21679506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of Different Types of Nasal Packing on Odor Function and Mucociliary Function After Septum Surgery.
    Caglar O; Guclu O; Oymak S; Derekoy S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2019 Sep; 98(8):486-489. PubMed ID: 31032654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Nasal Packing and Transseptal Suturing After Septoplasty on Olfactory Function, Patient Comfort, and Mucociliary Clearance.
    Dalgic A; Is A; Dinc ME; Ulusoy S; Avinçsal MÖ; Kulekci M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):e487-90. PubMed ID: 27391519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of polyvinyl acetal sponge nasal packing on post-operative care of nasal polyposis patients: a randomised, controlled, partly blinded study.
    Saedi B; Sadeghi M; Farschi S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Apr; 126(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 22310061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of septoplasty and per-operative antibiotic prophylaxis on nasal flora.
    Karaman E; Alimoglu Y; Aygun G; Kilic E; Yagiz C
    B-ENT; 2012; 8(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22545385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of different nasal packings on postoperative complications.
    Deniz M; Ciftçi Z; Işık A; Demirel OB; Gültekin E
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2014; 35(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 24943408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery.
    Arya AK; Butt O; Nigam A
    Rhinology; 2003 Dec; 41(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 14750352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.