192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31078407)
1. Correlation of multiple patient-reported outcome measures across follow-up in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty.
Michael RJ; Williams BA; Laguerre MD; Struk AM; Schoch BS; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Oct; 28(10):1869-1876. PubMed ID: 31078407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) be used as a stand-alone outcome instrument in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?
Baumgarten KM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Sep; 31(9):e426-e435. PubMed ID: 35413432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores correlate positively with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores postoperatively in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
Retzky JS; Baker M; Hannan CV; Srikumaran U
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):146-149. PubMed ID: 31401127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score highly correlates with the Simple Shoulder Test.
Baumgarten KM; Chang PS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):707-711. PubMed ID: 32711103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score has excellent correlation with the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis score.
Baumgarten KM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2604-2610. PubMed ID: 33895303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty.
Tashjian RZ; Hung M; Keener JD; Bowen RC; McAllister J; Chen W; Ebersole G; Granger EK; Chamberlain AM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Jan; 26(1):144-148. PubMed ID: 27545048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a machine learning-derived clinical metric to quantify outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Roche C; Kumar V; Overman S; Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Routman H; Teredesai A; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2211-2224. PubMed ID: 33607333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying success after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
Nieboer MJ; Hao KA; Tams C; King JJ; Wright TW; Parsons M; Schoch BS; Simovitch RW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Dec; 32(12):2501-2507. PubMed ID: 37302621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting outstanding results after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using percentage of maximal outcome improvement.
Berglund DD; Damodar D; Vakharia RM; Moeller EA; Giveans MR; Horn B; Mijic D; Levy JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Feb; 28(2):349-356. PubMed ID: 30404717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-reported drug and latex allergies negatively affect outcomes after total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Elrick BP; Johannsen AM; Dornan GJ; Millett PJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2753-2761. PubMed ID: 34087274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does total shoulder arthroplasty improve patients' activity levels?
Baumgarten KM; Chang PS; Dannenbring TM; Foley EK
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Nov; 27(11):1987-1995. PubMed ID: 29804913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rate of Improvement in Clinical Outcomes with Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Simovitch RW; Friedman RJ; Cheung EV; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman JD; Roche C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Nov; 99(21):1801-1811. PubMed ID: 29088034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PROMIS physical function underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Fu MC; Chang B; Wong AC; Nwachukwu BU; Warren RF; Dines DM; Dines JS; Cordasco FA; Lyman S; Gulotta LV
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Sep; 28(9):1809-1815. PubMed ID: 31010737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do patient outcomes and follow-up completion rates after shoulder arthroplasty differ based on insurance payor?
Lansdown DA; Ma GC; Aung MS; Gomez A; Zhang AL; Feeley BT; Ma CB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 32807374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Responsiveness and Internal Validity of Common Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Sciascia AD; Morris BJ; Jacobs CA; Edwards TB
Orthopedics; 2017 May; 40(3):e513-e519. PubMed ID: 28358978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative patient-reported scores can predict postoperative outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty.
Wong SE; Zhang AL; Berliner JL; Ma CB; Feeley BT
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jun; 25(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 27039669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting outstanding results after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using percentage of maximal outcome improvement.
DeVito P; Damodar D; Berglund D; Vakharia R; Moeller EA; Giveans MR; Horn B; Malarkey A; Levy JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1223-1231. PubMed ID: 30910258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores with legacy patient-reported outcome scores in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
Patterson BM; Orvets ND; Aleem AW; Keener JD; Calfee RP; Nixon DC; Chamberlain AM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jun; 27(6S):S17-S23. PubMed ID: 29776469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Depression and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Werner BC; Wong AC; Chang B; Craig EV; Dines DM; Warren RF; Gulotta LV
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Apr; 99(8):688-695. PubMed ID: 28419037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of patient satisfaction after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Rauck RC; Ruzbarsky JJ; Swarup I; Gruskay J; Dines JS; Warren RF; Dines DM; Gulotta LV
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Mar; 29(3):e67-e74. PubMed ID: 31619353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
