156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31079139)
1. An Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Patients with Ectodermal Dysplasia: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center in Turkey.
Çolak M
Med Sci Monit; 2019 May; 25():3503-3509. PubMed ID: 31079139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can the Density of Mineralized Dental Tissues (Dentin and Enamel) Be Measured and Compared with 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Cases of Ectodermal Dysplasia?
Yavuz Y; Akleyin E; Doğan MS; Goncharuk-Khomyn M; Akkus Z
Med Sci Monit; 2022 Jul; 28():e937003. PubMed ID: 35773958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Dimensional Modeling and Quantitative Assessment of Mandibular Volume in Ectodermal Dysplasia: A Case Series.
Akleyin E; Yavuz Y; Yardımeden A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Mar; 60(4):. PubMed ID: 38674174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of cone beam computed tomography in identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Brasileiro CB; Chalub LLFH; Abreu MHNG; Barreiros ID; Amaral TMP; Kakehasi AM; Mesquita RA
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):26. PubMed ID: 28265896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone Beam Computed Tomography of mandibular bone density in non-diabetic vs. diabetic populations.
Zhang W; Al Hatem O; Edwards L; Wang BY
Tex Dent J; 2016 Jul; 133(7):414-422. PubMed ID: 30549704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Qualitative Assessment of Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in evaluating Bone Density at Posterior Mandibular Implant Site.
Dahiya K; Kumar N; Bajaj P; Sharma A; Sikka R; Dahiya S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):426-430. PubMed ID: 29728548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of ectodermal dysplasia on volume and surface area of maxillary sinus.
Yalcin ED; Koparal M; Aksoy O
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 275(12):2991-2996. PubMed ID: 30343323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective study to estimate mandibular cancellous bone density using large-volume cone-beam computed tomography.
Naitoh M; Hirukawa A; Katsumata A; Ariji E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1309-13. PubMed ID: 20497440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study.
Kapoor V; Kumar N; Dahiya K; Sikka R; Sirana P; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mineral density and mandibular residual ridge resorption.
Springe B; Slaidina A; Soboleva U; Lejnieks A
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 24905270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Cervical Vertebral Bone Mineral Density in Adolescents Undergoing Functional Appliance Treatment.
Basheer S; Thimmaiah S; Alle RS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jul; 21(7):756-759. PubMed ID: 33020358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle.
Schlueter B; Kim KB; Oliver D; Sortiropoulos G
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):880-8. PubMed ID: 18298200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Qualitative Assessment of Bone Mineral Density in Individuals With Hemifacial Microsomia: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
ElNaghy R; Bous R; Chinoy A; Kumar A; Valiathan M
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Sep; 58(9):1086-1093. PubMed ID: 33251829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric Evaluation of Safe Zone for Bone Harvesting From Symphysis Region by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Altug HA; Coskun AT; Kamburoglu K; Zerener T; Gulen O; Sencimen M; Ozkan A
Implant Dent; 2016 Dec; 25(6):758-761. PubMed ID: 27356201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel method of assessment of BMD using CBCT for implant placement: A retrospective study.
AlQahtani SM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jul; 102(27):e34203. PubMed ID: 37417616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of clinical, radiological and three-dimensional dental tomography findings in ectodermal dysplasia cases.
Doğan MS; Callea M; Yavuz Ì; Aksoy O; Clarich G; Günay A; Günay A; Güven S; Maglione M; Akkuş Z
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 May; 20(3):e340-6. PubMed ID: 25662550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Silva IM; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GM; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 23184166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
