483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31079520)
1. Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.
Toft EL; Kaae SE; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Jun; 37(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 31079520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study.
Bertels L; Lucassen P; van Asselt K; Dekker E; van Weert H; Knottnerus B
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2020 Dec; 38(4):487-498. PubMed ID: 33185121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study.
Bie AKL; Brodersen J
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):262-271. PubMed ID: 30238859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A stitch in time saves nine: Perceptions about colorectal cancer screening after a non-cancer colonoscopy result. Qualitative study.
Kirkegaard P; Edwards A; Andersen B
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Jul; 102(7):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 30853142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
de Klerk CM; Vendrig LM; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 30158713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.
Steele RJC; Digby J; Chambers JA; O'Carroll RE
BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):411. PubMed ID: 30991987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study.
Juul JS; Andersen B; Laurberg S; Carlsen AH; Olesen F; Vedsted P
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):281-290. PubMed ID: 29929415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of false-positive results for future cancer screenings.
Taksler GB; Keating NL; Rothberg MB
Cancer; 2018 Jun; 124(11):2390-2398. PubMed ID: 29682740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review of the psychological impact of false-positive colorectal cancer screening: What is the role of the general practitioner?
van der Velde JL; Blanker MH; Stegmann ME; de Bock GH; Berger MY; Berendsen AJ
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 May; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 28493375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding familial risk assessment to faecal occult blood test can increase the effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening.
Dekker N; van Rossum LG; Van Vugt-van Pinxteren M; van Stiphout SH; Hermens RP; van Zelst-Stams WA; van Oijen MG; Laheij RJ; Jansen JB; Hoogerbrugge N
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jul; 47(10):1571-7. PubMed ID: 21367600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.
van der Vlugt M; Grobbee EJ; Bossuyt PMM; Bos A; Bongers E; Spijker W; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
Gastroenterology; 2017 Aug; 153(2):439-447.e2. PubMed ID: 28483499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False-positive results from colorectal cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain), 2000-2010.
Garcia M; Milà N; Binefa G; Borràs JM; Espinàs JA; Moreno V
J Med Screen; 2012 Jun; 19(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 22653571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.
Hewitson P; Glasziou P; Irwig L; Towler B; Watson E
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jan; 2007(1):CD001216. PubMed ID: 17253456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors associated with false-positive and false-negative fecal immunochemical test results for colorectal cancer screening.
Wong MC; Ching JY; Chan VC; Lam TY; Luk AK; Ng SS; Sung JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):596-607. PubMed ID: 25293827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.
Hardcastle JD; Chamberlain JO; Robinson MH; Moss SM; Amar SS; Balfour TW; James PD; Mangham CM
Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9040):1472-7. PubMed ID: 8942775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experiences of patients with false positive results from colorectal cancer screening.
Mant D; Fitzpatrick R; Hogg A; Fuller A; Farmer A; Verne J; Northover J
Br J Gen Pract; 1990 Oct; 40(339):423-5. PubMed ID: 2271264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
Malmqvist J; Siersma V; Bang CW; Brodersen J
BMC Psychol; 2021 Jan; 9(1):7. PubMed ID: 33413695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colorectal screening using the immunochemical faecal occult blood test kit among the Malaysian cohort participants.
Abdullah N; Abd Jalal N; Ismail N; Kamaruddin MA; Abd Mutalib NS; Alias MR; Mazlan L; Sagap I; Jamal R
Cancer Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 65():101656. PubMed ID: 31923638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Singal AG; Gupta S; Skinner CS; Ahn C; Santini NO; Agrawal D; Mayorga CA; Murphy C; Tiro JA; McCallister K; Sanders JM; Bishop WP; Loewen AC; Halm EA
JAMA; 2017 Sep; 318(9):806-815. PubMed ID: 28873161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
