141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31081014)
1. iMKT: the integrative McDonald and Kreitman test.
Murga-Moreno J; Coronado-Zamora M; Hervas S; Casillas S; Barbadilla A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jul; 47(W1):W283-W288. PubMed ID: 31081014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. impMKT: the imputed McDonald and Kreitman test, a straightforward correction that significantly increases the evidence of positive selection of the McDonald and Kreitman test at the gene level.
Murga-Moreno J; Coronado-Zamora M; Casillas S; Barbadilla A
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 35976111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard and generalized McDonald-Kreitman test: a website to detect selection by comparing different classes of DNA sites.
Egea R; Casillas S; Barbadilla A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Jul; 36(Web Server issue):W157-62. PubMed ID: 18515345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid genomic changes in Drosophila melanogaster adapting to desiccation stress in an experimental evolution system.
Kang L; Aggarwal DD; Rashkovetsky E; Korol AB; Michalak P
BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():233. PubMed ID: 26979755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive Evolution Is Substantially Impeded by Hill-Robertson Interference in Drosophila.
Castellano D; Coronado-Zamora M; Campos JL; Barbadilla A; Eyre-Walker A
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Feb; 33(2):442-55. PubMed ID: 26494843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mapping Selection within Drosophila melanogaster Embryo's Anatomy.
Salvador-Martínez I; Coronado-Zamora M; Castellano D; Barbadilla A; Salazar-Ciudad I
Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 29040697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila.
Andolfatto P
Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7062):1149-52. PubMed ID: 16237443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploiting selection at linked sites to infer the rate and strength of adaptation.
Uricchio LH; Petrov DA; Enard D
Nat Ecol Evol; 2019 Jun; 3(6):977-984. PubMed ID: 31061475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptation of Drosophila to a novel laboratory environment reveals temporally heterogeneous trajectories of selected alleles.
Orozco-terWengel P; Kapun M; Nolte V; Kofler R; Flatt T; Schlötterer C
Mol Ecol; 2012 Oct; 21(20):4931-41. PubMed ID: 22726122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of demography and weak selection on the McDonald-Kreitman test: an empirical study in Drosophila.
Parsch J; Zhang Z; Baines JF
Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Mar; 26(3):691-8. PubMed ID: 19126864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recombination enhances protein adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Presgraves DC
Curr Biol; 2005 Sep; 15(18):1651-6. PubMed ID: 16169487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomics of Parallel Experimental Evolution in Drosophila.
Graves JL; Hertweck KL; Phillips MA; Han MV; Cabral LG; Barter TT; Greer LF; Burke MK; Mueller LD; Rose MR
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Apr; 34(4):831-842. PubMed ID: 28087779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple mechanisms drive genomic adaptation to extreme O
Iranmehr A; Stobdan T; Zhou D; Zhao H; Kryazhimskiy S; Bafna V; Haddad GG
Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):997. PubMed ID: 33579965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genome-wide analysis of long-term evolutionary domestication in Drosophila melanogaster.
Phillips MA; Long AD; Greenspan ZS; Greer LF; Burke MK; Villeponteau B; Matsagas KC; Rizza CL; Mueller LD; Rose MR
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39281. PubMed ID: 28004838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic recombination and adaptation to fluctuating environments: selection for geotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster.
Bourguet D; Gair J; Mattice M; Whitlock MC
Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Jul; 91(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 12815456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. asymptoticMK: A Web-Based Tool for the Asymptotic McDonald-Kreitman Test.
Haller BC; Messer PW
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 May; 7(5):1569-1575. PubMed ID: 28341700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans.
Rand DM; Kann LM
Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Jul; 13(6):735-48. PubMed ID: 8754210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissecting Genomic Determinants of Positive Selection with an Evolution-Guided Regression Model.
Huang YF
Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 34597406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change.
Eyre-Walker A; Keightley PD
Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):2097-108. PubMed ID: 19535738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detecting past positive selection through ongoing negative selection.
Bazykin GA; Kondrashov AS
Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():1006-13. PubMed ID: 21859804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
