121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31081657)
1. The influence of syntactic expectations on reading comprehension is malleable and strategic: An eye-tracking study of English dative alternation.
Bridgwater E; Kyröläinen AJ; Kuperman V
Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Sep; 73(3):179-192. PubMed ID: 31081657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in comprehension: Sources of facilitation.
Tooley KM; Pickering MJ; Traxler MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2176-2196. PubMed ID: 30744509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linguistic networks associated with lexical, semantic and syntactic predictability in reading: A fixation-related fMRI study.
Carter BT; Foster B; Muncy NM; Luke SG
Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():224-240. PubMed ID: 30654173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity to verb bias in American sign language-English bilinguals.
Anible B; Twitchell P; Waters GS; Dussias PE; Piñar P; Morford JP
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2015 Jul; 20(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 25833965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.
Brothers T; Traxler MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1894-1906. PubMed ID: 27123753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A failure to replicate rapid syntactic adaptation in comprehension.
Harrington Stack CM; James AN; Watson DG
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):864-877. PubMed ID: 29651687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension.
Fine AB; Jaeger TF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1362-76. PubMed ID: 26962961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can We 'Read' the Eye-Movement Patterns of Readers? Unraveling the Relationship Between Reading Profiles and Processing Strategies.
Koornneef A; Mulders I
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 26996449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are figurative interpretations of idioms directly retrieved, compositionally built, or both? Evidence from eye movement measures of reading.
Titone D; Lovseth K; Kasparian K; Tiv M
Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Dec; 73(4):216-230. PubMed ID: 31192627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension.
Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel I
Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):139-52. PubMed ID: 16765335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eye movement control in Chinese reading: A cross-sectional study.
Yan M; Pan J; Kliegl R
Dev Psychol; 2019 Nov; 55(11):2275-2285. PubMed ID: 31535894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interaction Between Syntactic Structure and Information Structure in the Processing of a Head-Final Language.
Koizumi M; Imamura S
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):247-260. PubMed ID: 27229871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.
Knoeferle P; Crocker MW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2338-71. PubMed ID: 19418379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming?
Bernolet S; Hartsuiker RJ
Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 20034624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Givenness, complexity, and the Danish dative alternation.
Kizach J; Balling LW
Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1159-71. PubMed ID: 23743603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognate effects on anaphor processing.
Lauro J; Schwartz AI
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):381-396. PubMed ID: 29999399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new argument for co-active parses during language comprehension.
Dillon B; Andrews C; Rotello CM; Wagers M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1271-1286. PubMed ID: 30124311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eye-tracking evidence for active gap-filling regardless of dependency length.
Chow WY; Zhou Y
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 30238828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
