151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31081657)
21. Lexical constraints on the prediction of form: Insights from the visual world paradigm.
Kukona A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2153-2162. PubMed ID: 32658542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The mechanisms of prediction updating that impact the processing of upcoming word: An event-related potential study on sentence comprehension.
Szewczyk JM; Wodniecka Z
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1714-1734. PubMed ID: 32297790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cognate effects on anaphor processing.
Lauro J; Schwartz AI
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):381-396. PubMed ID: 29999399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A new argument for co-active parses during language comprehension.
Dillon B; Andrews C; Rotello CM; Wagers M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1271-1286. PubMed ID: 30124311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Convergent probabilistic cues do not trigger syntactic adaptation: Evidence from self-paced reading.
Dempsey J; Liu Q; Christianson K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1906-1921. PubMed ID: 32551745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Eye-tracking evidence for active gap-filling regardless of dependency length.
Chow WY; Zhou Y
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 30238828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Syntactic priming without lexical overlap in reading comprehension.
Kim CS; Carbary KM; Tanenhaus MK
Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):181-95. PubMed ID: 25102605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of Verb Overlap on Structural Priming in Dialogue: Implications for Syntactic Learning in Aphasia.
Man G; Meehan S; Martin N; Branigan H; Lee J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1933-1950. PubMed ID: 31112446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Structure prediction occurs when it is needed: Evidence from visual-world structural priming in Dutch comprehension.
Chen X; Hartsuiker RJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jun; 49(6):941-958. PubMed ID: 36521153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Persistent structural priming during online second-language comprehension.
Wei H; Boland JE; Cai ZG; Yuan F; Wang M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):349-359. PubMed ID: 29698036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The dynamic adjustment of saccades during Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements and simulations.
Liu Y; Yu L; Reichle ED
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):535-543. PubMed ID: 29985033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of state change on object representations in language comprehension.
Kang X; Eerland A; Joergensen GH; Zwaan RA; Altmann GTM
Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):390-399. PubMed ID: 31625060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cross-age comparisons reveal multiple strategies for lexical ambiguity resolution during natural reading.
Stites MC; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1823-41. PubMed ID: 23687920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impaired comprehension of alternating syntactic constructions in autism.
Stockbridge MD; Happé FG; White SJ
Autism Res; 2014 Jun; 7(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 24227788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Graded expectations in visually situated comprehension: Costs and benefits as indexed by the N400.
Staudte M; Ankener C; Drenhaus H; Crocker MW
Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):624-631. PubMed ID: 33269463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicting and priming thematic roles: Flexible use of verbal and nonverbal cues during relative clause comprehension.
Kowalski A; Huang YT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1341-1351. PubMed ID: 28252989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Examining the role of context in written sarcasm comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading.
Țurcan A; Howman H; Filik R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1966-1976. PubMed ID: 32658544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
