These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31081709)

  • 1. Is corifollitropin alfa effective in controlled ovarian stimulation among all poor ovarian responders? A retrospective comparative study.
    Andrisani A; Marin L; Ragazzi E; Donà G; Bordin L; Dessole F; Armanini D; Esposito F; Vitagliano A; Sabbadin C; Ambrosini G
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2019 Oct; 35(10):894-898. PubMed ID: 31081709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Drakopoulos P; Vuong TNL; Ho NAV; Vaiarelli A; Ho MT; Blockeel C; Camus M; Lam AT; van de Vijver A; Humaidan P; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2225-2233. PubMed ID: 29040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the follicular output rate after controlled ovarian stimulation with daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus corifollitropin alfa.
    Griesinger G; Teal V; McCrary Sisk C; Ruman J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jan; 232():101-105. PubMed ID: 30529793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kolibianakis EM; Venetis CA; Bosdou JK; Zepiridis L; Chatzimeletiou K; Makedos A; Masouridou S; Triantafillidis S; Mitsoli A; Tarlatzis BC
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 25492411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large, comparative, randomized double-blind trial confirming noninferiority of pregnancy rates for corifollitropin alfa compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in older patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Boostanfar R; Shapiro B; Levy M; Rosenwaks Z; Witjes H; Stegmann BJ; Elbers J; Gordon K; Mannaerts B;
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jul; 104(1):94-103.e1. PubMed ID: 26003273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.
    Humaidan P; Chin W; Rogoff D; D'Hooghe T; Longobardi S; Hubbard J; Schertz J;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):544-555. PubMed ID: 28137754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corifollitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Cozzolino M; Vitagliano A; Cecchino GN; Ambrosini G; Garcia-Velasco JA
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):722-733. PubMed ID: 30929731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily FSH in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.
    Fensore S; Di Marzio M; Tiboni GM
    J Ovarian Res; 2015 Jun; 8():33. PubMed ID: 26036214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Addition of highly purified HMG after corifollitropin alfa in antagonist-treated poor ovarian responders: a pilot study.
    Polyzos NP; De Vos M; Corona R; Vloeberghs V; Ortega-Hrepich C; Stoop D; Tournaye H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1254-60. PubMed ID: 23442756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily rFSH or HP-HMG in GnRH antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol for patients undergoing assisted reproduction.
    Souza PMG; Carvalho BR; Nakagawa HM; Rassi TRE; Barbosa ACP; Silva AA
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2017 Jun; 21(2):67-69. PubMed ID: 28609269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there a place for corifollitropin alfa in IVF/ICSI cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mahmoud Youssef MA; van Wely M; Aboulfoutouh I; El-Khyat W; van der Veen F; Al-Inany H
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):876-85. PubMed ID: 22277766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pituitary suppression protocol among Bologna poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa: does it play any role?
    Errázuriz J; Drakopoulos P; Pening D; Racca A; Romito A; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M; Blockeel C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 30879911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of ovarian response in women treated with corifollitropin alfa for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Polyzos NP; Tournaye H; Guzman L; Camus M; Nelson SM
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 23668992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa followed by hp-hMG compared to hp-hMG in patients at risk of poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI: A randomized controlled trial.
    Taronger R; Martínez-Cuenca S; Ferreros I; Rubio JM; Fernández-Colom PJ; Martínez-Triguero ML; Pellicer A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Dec; 231():192-197. PubMed ID: 30428403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily FSH in controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte donors].
    Benchabane M; Santulli P; Maignien C; Bourdon M; De Ziegler D; Chapron C; Gayet V
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Feb; 45(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 28368800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective randomized trial comparing corifollitropin-α late-start (day 4) versus standard administration (day 2) in expected poor, normal, and high responders undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.
    Revelli A; Gennarelli G; Sestero M; Canosa S; Carosso A; Salvagno F; Pittatore G; Filippini C; Benedetto C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 May; 37(5):1163-1170. PubMed ID: 32185595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Devroey P; Boostanfar R; Koper NP; Mannaerts BM; Ijzerman-Boon PC; Fauser BC;
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Dec; 24(12):3063-72. PubMed ID: 19684043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Patient Friendly Corifollitropin Alfa Protocol without Routine Pituitary Suppression in Normal Responders.
    Wang HL; Lai HH; Chuang TH; Shih YW; Huang SC; Lee MJ; Chen SU
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154123. PubMed ID: 27100388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacokinetics and follicular dynamics of corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation for IVF.
    Fauser BC; Alper MM; Ledger W; Schoolcraft WB; Zandvliet A; Mannaerts BM;
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 20843746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.