These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Improved Postoperative Speech Recognition and Processor Use With Early Cochlear Implant Activation. Patro A; Lindquist NR; Holder JT; Freeman MH; Gifford RH; Tawfik KO; O'Malley MR; Bennett ML; Haynes DS; Perkins EL Otol Neurotol; 2024 Apr; 45(4):386-391. PubMed ID: 38437818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Duration of Processor Use Per Day Is Significantly Correlated With Speech Recognition Abilities in Adults With Cochlear Implants. Holder JT; Dwyer NC; Gifford RH Otol Neurotol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):e227-e231. PubMed ID: 31789794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Benefit of a Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) Microphone in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients. Kurien G; Hwang E; Smilsky K; Smith L; Lin VYW; Nedzelski J; Chen JM Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e82-e88. PubMed ID: 30570612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech Discrimination Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients by Primary Language and Bilingual Hispanic Patients. Velandia S; Martinez D; Peña S; Misztal C; Goncalves S; Ma R; Angeli S; Telischi F; Holcomb M; Dinh CT Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jan; 170(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 37622538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contribution of noise reduction pre-processing and microphone directionality strategies in the speech recognition in noise in adult cochlear implant users. Goffi-Gomez MVS; Muniz L; Wiemes G; Onuki LC; Calonga L; Osterne FJ; Kós MI; Caldas FF; Cardoso C; Cagnacci B Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 278(8):2823-2828. PubMed ID: 32948894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness in children and adolescents. Zeitler DM; Sladen DP; DeJong MD; Torres JH; Dorman MF; Carlson ML Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 118():128-133. PubMed ID: 30623849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Further Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria. Perkins E; Dietrich MS; Manzoor N; O'Malley M; Bennett M; Rivas A; Haynes D; Labadie R; Gifford R Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jul; 42(6):815-823. PubMed ID: 33606469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception comparisons using an implanted and an external microphone in existing cochlear implant users. Jenkins HA; Uhler K Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22158017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]