These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3108309)

  • 1. Identification of Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium and susceptibility studies with newly developed antimicrobial agents.
    Kim MJ; Weiser M; Gottschall S; Randall EL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 May; 25(5):787-90. PubMed ID: 3108309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative killing activity and postantibiotic effect of streptomycin combined with ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, piperacillin or vancomycin against strains of Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium.
    Fuursted K
    Chemotherapy; 1988; 34(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 3138078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1992). I. Susceptibility distribution].
    Kumamoto Y; Hirose T; Tanaka N; Hikichi Y; Shigeta S; Shiraiwa Y; Kameoka H; Yoshida H; Ogata M; Tazaki H
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1995 Nov; 48(11):1627-57. PubMed ID: 8558754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from patients with urinary tract infections (1996). I. Susceptibility distribution].
    Kumamoto Y; Tsukamoto T; Hirose T; Yokoo A; Shigeta S; Takahashi T; Shiraiwa Y; Ogiwara M; Yoshida H; Imafuku Y; Murai M; Watanabe K; Uchida H; Kobayashi Y; Matsuda S; Fujime M; Fujita K; Igari J; Oguri T; Yamaguchi K; Matsumoto T; Kashitani F; Kaku M; Ooe H; Mochida C
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1998 Feb; 51(2):69-111. PubMed ID: 9575437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative activity of imipenem (N-formimidoyl thienamycin) on enterococci and its interactions with aminoglycosides.
    Aznar J; García Iglesias MC; Perea EJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1984 Feb; 13(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 6423613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of penicillin, ampicillin, and imipenem MICs and susceptibility breakpoints for vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium.
    Weinstein MP
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2729-31. PubMed ID: 11427608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1989). I. Susceptibility distribution].
    Kumamoto Y; Hirose T; Tanaka N; Hikichi Y; Shigeta S; Shiraiwa Y; Kameoka H; Yoshida H; Ogata M; Tazaki H
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1995 Sep; 48(9):1131-60. PubMed ID: 7474333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1993). I. Susceptibility distribution].
    Kumamoto Y; Hirose T; Tanaka N; Hikichi Y; Shigeta S; Shiraiwa Y; Kameoka H; Yoshida H; Tazaki H; Iri H
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1995 Nov; 48(11):1757-87. PubMed ID: 8558757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro activity of CI-934, a new quinolone antimicrobial, against gram-positive bacteria.
    Eliopoulos GM; Reiszner E; Caputo GM; Moellering RC
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 Nov; 5(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 3096629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparative in vitro activity of clinafloxacin and other antimicrobials against vancomycin-susceptible and vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
    Itokazu GS; Nathan C; Hariharan R; Kostman JR; Kabins SA; Weinstein RA
    Chemotherapy; 1996; 42(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 8804789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro activity of CI-934 compared with ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, and vancomycin.
    Floyd-Reising SA; Kelley SG; Hindler JA; Young LS
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Apr; 6(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 3472704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci recovered from healthy cattle, pigs and chickens in nine EU countries (EASSA Study) to critically important antibiotics.
    de Jong A; Simjee S; Garch FE; Moyaert H; Rose M; Youala M; Dry M;
    Vet Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 216():168-175. PubMed ID: 29519512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from patients with urinary tract infections (1997). I. Susceptibility distribution].
    Kumamoto Y; Tsukamoto T; Hirose T; Yokoo A; Fujime M; Fujita K; Shigeta S; Watanabe J; Igari J; Ogiwara M; Ishibashi K; Oguri T; Yoshida H; Imafuku Y; Yamaguchi K; Matsumoto T; Kashitani F; Murai M; Ooe H; Nishikawa M; Watanabe K; Kobayashi Y; Uchida H; Oka T; Mochida C
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1999 Feb; 52(2):93-129. PubMed ID: 10221177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Enterococcus faecalis clinical isolates with 'penicillin-resistant, ampicillin-susceptible' phenotype as reported by Vitek-2 Compact system.
    Tan YE; Ng LS; Tan TY
    Pathology; 2014 Oct; 46(6):544-50. PubMed ID: 25158809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from patients with urinary tract infections (1995). I. Susceptibility distribution].
    Kumamoto Y; Tsukamoto T; Hirose T; Yokoo A; Hikichi Y; Shigeta S; Takanashi T; Shiraiwa Y; Ogiwara M; Yoshida H; Imafuku Y; Murai M; Watanabe K; Uchida H; Kobayashi Y; Matsuda S; Fujime M; Fujita K; Igari J; Oguri T; Kosakai N; Yamaguchi K; Matsumoto T; Kashitani F; Tanaka M
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1997 Mar; 50(3):219-50. PubMed ID: 9575353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of teicoplanin and other antimicrobials against streptococci group D bacteria.
    Breyer S; Georgopoulos A; Graninger W
    Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1987; 13(8):479-81. PubMed ID: 2962843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium in infected dental root canals at filling and their susceptibility to azidocillin and some comparable antibiotics.
    Mejàre B
    Odontol Revy; 1975; 26(3):193-204. PubMed ID: 810753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Susceptibility patterns of enterococci causing infections.
    Oncu S; Punar M; Eraksoy H
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2004 Jan; 202(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 14738321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (agar disk diffusion and agar dilution) of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium: comparison of Mueller-Hinton, Iso-Sensitest, and Wilkins-Chalgren agar media.
    Traub WH; Geipel U; Leonhard B
    Chemotherapy; 1998; 44(4):217-29. PubMed ID: 9681198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phenotypic and molecular antibiotic resistance profile of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from different traditional fermented foods.
    Sánchez Valenzuela A; Lavilla Lerma L; Benomar N; Gálvez A; Pérez Pulido R; Abriouel H
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2013 Feb; 10(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 23259502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.