These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31084481)
1. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images. Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT. Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis. Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study. Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening? Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening. Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening. Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reader performances in breast lesion characterization via DBT: One or two views and which view? Boisselier A; Mandoul C; Monsonis B; Delebecq J; Millet I; Pages E; Taourel P Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109880. PubMed ID: 34358811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading. Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more? Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation. Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation. Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography. Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial. Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C; Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density. Shin SU; Chang JM; Bae MS; Lee SH; Cho N; Seo M; Kim WH; Moon WK Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25182628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study. Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery. Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]