134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31084531)
1. Use of Transparent Tips for Obtaining Tight Proximal Contacts in Direct Class II Composite Resin Restorations.
Alonso V; Caserio M; Darriba IL
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(5):446-451. PubMed ID: 31084531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations.
Moosavi H; Abedini S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of cervical gaps in class II composite resin restorations.
Ericson D; Dérand T
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 2033541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.
Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR
Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts?
Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Asscherickx K; Simon S; Abe Y; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Dent Mater; 2001 Nov; 17(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 11567692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resin composite contours.
Sidelsky H
Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New instrumentation and technique for obtaining consistent interproximal contacts of direct Class II composite restorations.
Slone CE
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1994; 6(5):15-20; quiz 22. PubMed ID: 7994013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II resin composite restorations in vitro.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 17153978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishing approximal contacts in Class 2 composite resin restorations.
Doukoudakis S
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):182-4. PubMed ID: 9484169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the proximal contact tightness in class II resin composite restorations using different contact forming instruments: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
Abbassy KM; Elmahy WA; Holiel AA
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):729. PubMed ID: 37805456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 133(10):1387-98. PubMed ID: 12403542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations.
Kampouropoulos D; Paximada C; Loukidis M; Kakaboura A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 20672731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impression matrix technique for cusp replacement using direct composite resin.
Denehy G; Cobb D
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(4):227-33; discussion 234. PubMed ID: 15672615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique.
Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishing proximal contacts with pre-polymerized composite inserts.
Dunn WJ
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 15279490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
