These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Solitary pulmonary nodules: a comparative study evaluated with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. Kim JH; Kim HJ; Lee KH; Kim KH; Lee HL J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(6):766-75. PubMed ID: 15538149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Limited diagnostic value of Dual-Time-Point (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging for classifying solitary pulmonary nodules in granuloma-endemic regions both at visual and quantitative analyses. Chen S; Li X; Chen M; Yin Y; Li N; Li Y Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1744-1749. PubMed ID: 27666611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Overestimated value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose pulmonary nodules: Analysis of 298 patients. Li S; Zhao B; Wang X; Yu J; Yan S; Lv C; Yang Y Clin Radiol; 2014 Aug; 69(8):e352-7. PubMed ID: 24877581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with first-pass dual-input perfusion CT. Yuan X; Zhang J; Quan C; Cao J; Ao G; Tian Y; Li H Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2469-74. PubMed ID: 23793548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography. Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparative analysis of integrated (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT/localizable CT and integrated ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT for differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules]. Deng Z; Li G; Xiang X; Jia L; Liu C; Chen T; Liu C Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2015 Mar; 35(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 25818793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Miwa K; Inubushi M; Wagatsuma K; Nagao M; Murata T; Koyama M; Koizumi M; Sasaki M Eur J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 83(4):715-9. PubMed ID: 24418285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-way Comparison of Whole-Body MR, Coregistered Whole-Body FDG PET/MR, and Integrated Whole-Body FDG PET/CT Imaging: TNM and Stage Assessment Capability for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Ohno Y; Koyama H; Yoshikawa T; Takenaka D; Seki S; Yui M; Yamagata H; Aoyagi K; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K Radiology; 2015 Jun; 275(3):849-61. PubMed ID: 25584709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of different size of solitary pulmonary nodules. Tang K; Wang L; Lin J; Zheng X; Wu Y Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(11):e14813. PubMed ID: 30882661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The value of four imaging modalities to distinguish malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules: a study based on 73 cohorts incorporating 7956 individuals. Wu Q; Zhong L; Xie X Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Feb; 23(2):296-310. PubMed ID: 32548796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus Feng F; Qiang F; Shen A; Shi D; Fu A; Li H; Zhang M; Xia G; Cao P Chin J Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 30(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 29545716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 18-FDG in identifying malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. Dabrowska M; Krenke R; Korczynski P; Maskey-Warzechowska M; Zukowska M; Kunikowska J; Orłowski T; Chazan R Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Apr; 94(15):e666. PubMed ID: 25881842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network Assessment of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Compared With PET With CT Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging. Weir-McCall JR; Debruyn E; Harris S; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Gleeson FV; Gilbert FJ; Chest; 2023 Feb; 163(2):444-454. PubMed ID: 36087795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. STIR turbo SE MR imaging vs. coregistered FDG-PET/CT: quantitative and qualitative assessment of N-stage in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ohno Y; Koyama H; Nogami M; Takenaka D; Yoshikawa T; Yoshimura M; Ohbayashi C; Sugimura K J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1071-80. PubMed ID: 17896365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities in the assessment of distant metastasis and local recurrence of tumor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ohno Y; Yoshikawa T; Kishida Y; Seki S; Koyama H; Yui M; Kassai Y; Aoyagi K; Kaminaga S; Sugimura K J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1707-1717. PubMed ID: 28419645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. Christensen JA; Nathan MA; Mullan BP; Hartman TE; Swensen SJ; Lowe VJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1361-7. PubMed ID: 17056930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A model of malignant risk prediction for solitary pulmonary nodules on Yu M; Wang Z; Yang G; Cheng Y Thorac Cancer; 2020 May; 11(5):1211-1215. PubMed ID: 32162769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]