These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31084997)
21. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events. Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The fluoroscopy time, door to balloon time, contrast volume use and prevalence of vascular access site failure with transradial versus transfemoral approach in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review & meta-analysis. Singh S; Singh M; Grewal N; Khosla S Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Dec; 16(8):491-7. PubMed ID: 26563537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Transfemoral Cerebral Angiography and Transradial Cerebral Angiography Following a Shift in Practice During Four Years at a Single Center in China. Ge B; Wei Y Med Sci Monit; 2020 Mar; 26():e921631. PubMed ID: 32210222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radial access protects from contrast media induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization procedures. Feldkamp T; Luedemann M; Spehlmann ME; Freitag-Wolf S; Gaensbacher J; Schulte K; Bajrovic A; Hinzmann D; Hippe HJ; Kunzendorf U; Frey N; Luedde M Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 107(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28939956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radial artery versus femoral artery access options in coronary angiogram procedures: randomized controlled trial of a patient-decision aid. Schwalm JD; Stacey D; Pericak D; Natarajan MK Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 May; 5(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 22496115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radial first or patient first: a case series and meta-analysis of transradial versus transfemoral access for acute ischemic stroke intervention. Siddiqui AH; Waqas M; Neumaier J; Zhang JF; Dossani RH; Cappuzzo JM; Van Coevering Iii RJ; Rai HH; Monteiro A; Sonig A; Davies JM; Snyder KV; Levy EI J Neurointerv Surg; 2021 Aug; 13(8):687-692. PubMed ID: 33632879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prediction and impact of failure of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Abdelaal E; MacHaalany J; Plourde G; Barria Perez A; Bouchard MP; Roy M; Déry JP; Déry U; Barbeau G; Larose É; Gleeton O; Noël B; Rodés-Cabau J; Roy L; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF Heart; 2016 Jun; 102(12):919-25. PubMed ID: 27030600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of vascular approach (transradial vs. transfemoral) on the efficacy of thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction patients. Sciahbasi A; Burzotta F; Rigattieri S; Pendenza G; Romagnoli E; Trani C; Loschiavo P; Penco M; Lioy E Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 22226170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Low rate of conversion to transfemoral approach when attempting both radial arteries for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a study of 1,826 consecutive procedures. Guédès A; Dangoisse V; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Sep; 22(9):391-7. PubMed ID: 20814043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transition Towards Transradial Approach Improves Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction PCI. Kalpak O; Donev D; Pejkov H; Antov S; Kalpak G; Kedev S Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Sep; 38(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 28991770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset. Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Short-term risk of periprocedural stroke relative to radial vs. femoral access: systematic review, meta-analysis, study sequential analysis and meta-regression of 2,188,047 real-world cardiac catheterizations. Tužil J; Matějka J; Mamas MA; Doležal T Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2023 Apr; 21(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 36877129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Training the next generation of invasive cardiologists: Feasibility of implementing a trans-radial access program at an academic hospital. Stolker JM; Hadid M; Hussain ZM; Rough SJ; Ibrahim M; Kennedy KF; Safley DM; Baklanov DV; Neumayr RH Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(7):431-437. PubMed ID: 27460342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]