These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31085464)

  • 1. Glottal function index questionnaire for screening of pediatric dysphonia.
    Pribuisiene R; Pribuisis K; Liutkevicius V; Balsevicius T; Milasiene R; Uloza V
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 123():97-101. PubMed ID: 31085464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dysphonia screening in vocally trained and untrained children.
    Pribuisiene R; Pasvenskaite A; Pribuisis K; Balsevicius T; Liutkevicius V; Uloza V
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 129():109776. PubMed ID: 31759227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Glottal Function Index.
    Pribuišienė R; Baceviciene M; Uloza V; Vegiene A; Antuseva J
    J Voice; 2012 Mar; 26(2):e73-8. PubMed ID: 21621974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.
    Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM
    J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
    Esen Aydinli F; Özcebe E; İncebay Ö
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the Effects of Glottal Stop Productions on Voice in Children With Cleft Palate Using Multidimensional Voice Assessment Methods.
    Aydınlı FE; Özcebe E; Kulak Kayıkçı ME; Yılmaz T; Özgür FF
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e9-763.e15. PubMed ID: 26739858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
    Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
    de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; de Souza GS; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Performance Time of the Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Exercises in Dysphonic Children.
    Ramos LA; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 27658337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.
    Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
    Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.
    Barsties V Latoszek B; Lehnert B; Janotte B
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):157.e17-157.e25. PubMed ID: 30217485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the cepstral acoustic characteristics of voice in healthy children.
    Demirci AN; Köse A; Aydinli FE; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 148():110815. PubMed ID: 34217000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments.
    Englert M; Latoszek BBV; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):567-571. PubMed ID: 35022153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic Psychometric Severity Index of Dysphonia (APSID): Development and Clinical Application.
    Lee SJ; Choi HS; Kim H
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e19-660.e25. PubMed ID: 31810840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
    Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.