These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31085630)
1. The concise argument: the importance of consent and choice. McMillan J J Med Ethics; 2019 May; 45(5):285-286. PubMed ID: 31085630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Electronic fences make good neighbors: the importance of medical records managers to protecting autonomy. Fox MD; Munoz RT Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 23514400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Data citizenship and informed consent. Francis LP; Francis JG Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 23514394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can informed consent go too far? Balancing consent and public benefit in research. Milner LC; Magnus D Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 23514383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How and when does consent bias research? Groenwold RH; van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):46-8. PubMed ID: 23514398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent, big data, and the oxymoron of research that is not research. Ioannidis JP Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):40-2. PubMed ID: 23514395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of evidence on consent bias in research. El Emam K; Jonker E; Moher E; Arbuckle L Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 23514396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The interaction between research consent and random error. Trafimow D Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):49-50. PubMed ID: 23514399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An unbiased response to the open peer commentaries on "does consent bias research?". Rothstein MA; Shoben AB Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):W1-4. PubMed ID: 23514403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A thick opt-out is often sufficient. Giesbertz NA; Bredenoord AL; van Delden JJ Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 23514397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The biobank consent debate: Why 'meta-consent' is not the solution? Manson NC J Med Ethics; 2019 May; 45(5):291-294. PubMed ID: 30275112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does consent bias research? Rothstein MA; Shoben AB Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(4):27-37. PubMed ID: 23514393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository Development. Roessler BJ; Steneck NH; Connally L J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Feb; 10(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 25742665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Trust-Based Pact in Research Biobanks. From Theory to Practice. Sanchini V; Bonizzi G; Disalvatore D; Monturano M; Pece S; Viale G; Di Fiore PP; Boniolo G Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):260-71. PubMed ID: 26307361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed Consent and the Use of Biospecimens in Research. Eisenhauer ER Am J Nurs; 2015 Jul; 115(7):11. PubMed ID: 26110932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics of research on human biological materials. Lwoff L Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 18183011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition of Research Participants' Need for Autonomy: Remembering the Legacy of Henrietta Lacks. Wolinetz CD; Collins FS JAMA; 2020 Sep; 324(11):1027-1028. PubMed ID: 32930765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance? D'Abramo F J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Nov; 69(11):1125-8. PubMed ID: 25669218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]