These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Polytetrafluoroethylene relative isolation for adhesive cementation of dental restorations. Roig-Vanaclocha A; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Agustín-Panadero R J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 35934570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The rubber dam-retaining appliance: an adjunct to isolation during placement of multiple veneers. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 1995 Jul; 26(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 8935035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions. Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez I; Lisboa AH; Higashi C; Queiroz VA; Rego RO; Reis A Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):581-93. PubMed ID: 26158415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternative rubber dam isolation technique for the restoration of Class V cervical lesions. Owens BM Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 16827034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. General field isolation and the cementation of indirect restorations: Part I. Liebenberg WH J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1994 Jul; 49(7):349-53. PubMed ID: 9508953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extending the use of rubber dam isolation: alternative procedures. Part II. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 1993 Jan; 24(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 8511260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precision and security in restorative dentistry: the synergy of isolation and magnification. Browet S; Gerdolle D Int J Esthet Dent; 2017; 12(2):172-185. PubMed ID: 28653049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. General field isolation and the cementation of indirect restorations: Part II. Liebenberg WH J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1994 Aug; 49(8):415-9. PubMed ID: 9508977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does operatory field isolation influence the performance of direct adhesive restorations? Daudt E; Lopes GC; Vieira LC J Adhes Dent; 2013 Feb; 15(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 23534003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rubber dam isolation of cervical lesions. Part 1: Alternative techniques which avoid injury to the periodontium. Liebenberg WH FDI World; 1994; 3(5):17-8, 20, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 9552650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report. Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rubber dam isolation--key to success in diastema closure technique with direct composite resin. Barros de Campos PR; Maia RR; Rodrigues de Menezes L; Barbosa IF; Carneiro da Cunha A; da Silveira Pereira GD Int J Esthet Dent; 2015; 10(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 26794052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical applications of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape in restorative dentistry. Sattar MM; Patel M; Alani A Br Dent J; 2017 Feb; 222(3):151-158. PubMed ID: 28184055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Veneziani M Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(1):50-76. PubMed ID: 20305873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry. Thomas MS; Joseph RM; Parolia A Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):26-34; quiz 36, 38. PubMed ID: 21755893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Sterilization in dentistry. Suta P; Márton I; D Tóth E; Martos R Orv Hetil; 2020 Jan; 161(3):110-115. PubMed ID: 31928061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft tissue management for difficult cervical restorations. Meraner M Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 16689068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]