These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model. Schlager D; Hein S; Obaid MA; Wilhelm K; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 28844156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures. Defidio L; De Dominicis M; Di Gianfrancesco L; Fuchs G; Patel A J Endourol; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1329-34. PubMed ID: 22563938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of a new disposable flexible ureterorenoscope and comparison to an established disposable flexible ureterorenoscope: a prospective, observational study. Patterson K; Yap LC; Elamin M; Maccraith E; Muheilan M; Sharif A; McGuinness G; Darcy F; Brady C; Hennessey D Int Urol Nephrol; 2021 May; 53(5):875-881. PubMed ID: 33386582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study. Doizi S; Kamphuis G; Giusti G; Andreassen KH; Knoll T; Osther PJ; Scoffone C; Pérez-Fentes D; Proietti S; Wiseman O; de la Rosette J; Traxer O World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):809-818. PubMed ID: 27671898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons. Carey RI; Martin CJ; Knego JR Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24837456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Conventional fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope versus fourth generation digital flexible ureteroscope: a critical comparison. Multescu R; Geavlete B; Georgescu D; Geavlete P J Endourol; 2010 Jan; 24(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19954350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course. Ozimek T; Cordes J; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Gilbert N; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):597-602. PubMed ID: 29737199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage. Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Initial Experience and Clinical Assessment of the Karl Storz FLEX-XC1 Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope. Alamiri J; Qi R; Hanna KF; White LA; Ungerer GN; Kemble JP; Thompson CA; Potretzke AM; Koo K Urol Pract; 2024 May; 11(3):462-468. PubMed ID: 38526412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A safety guidewire influences the pushing and pulling forces needed to move the ureteroscope in the ureter: a clinical randomized, crossover study. Ulvik Ø; Wentzel-Larsen T; Ulvik NM J Endourol; 2013 Jul; 27(7):850-5. PubMed ID: 23477375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective evaluation of flexible ureteroscopes with a novel evaluation tool. Bell JR; Penniston KL; Best SL; Nakada SY Can J Urol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):9004-9010. PubMed ID: 28971788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Resilience of disposable endoscope optical fiber properties after repeat sterilization. Johnson MT; Khemees TA; Knudsen BE J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 22894548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Initial experience of comparison between two slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscopes: Indoscope Sleek (Bioradmedisys™) Versus Uscope PU3033A (Pusen™): A single-center prospective study. Agrawal S; Survase P; Singh AG; Ganpule AP; Sabnis RB; Desai MR World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2817-2821. PubMed ID: 37543971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes. Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does the cleaning technique influence the durability of the <9F flexible ureteroscope? McDougall EM; Alberts G; Deal KJ; Nagy JM J Endourol; 2001 Aug; 15(6):615-8. PubMed ID: 11552787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An evaluation of Cidex OPA (0.55% ortho-phthalaldehyde) as an alternative to 2% glutaraldehyde for high-level disinfection of endoscopes. Cooke RP; Goddard SV; Whymant-Morris A; Sherwood J; Chatterly R J Hosp Infect; 2003 Jul; 54(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 12855240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Disinfection of rigid nasal endoscopes following in vitro contamination with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae. Bradford BD; Seiberling KA; Park FE; Hiebert JC; Chang DF JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jun; 139(6):574-8. PubMed ID: 23680971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The application of a single-use fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope for the management of upper urinary calculi. Wang F; Yang Y; Chen H; Huang H; Huang W; Weng Z; Xie H Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 29797215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]