These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31088550)
1. Reflective and feedback performances on Thai medical students' patient history-taking skills. Tawanwongsri W; Phenwan T BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):141. PubMed ID: 31088550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The AaLplus near-peer teaching program in Family Medicine strengthens basic medical skills-A five-year retrospective study. Schwill S; Hundertmark J; Fahrbach-Veeser J; Eicher C; Tonchev P; Kurczyk S; Szecsenyi J; Loukanova S PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233748. PubMed ID: 32470972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students' communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity. Hulsman RL; van der Vloodt J Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Mar; 98(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 25433967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients. Hulsman RL; Harmsen AB; Fabriek M Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Feb; 74(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 19062232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study. Inayah AT; Anwer LA; Shareef MA; Nurhussen A; Alkabbani HM; Alzahrani AA; Obad AS; Zafar M; Afsar NA BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e012289. PubMed ID: 28487454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer-Assisted History-Taking Groups: A Subjective Assessment of their Impact Upon Medical Students' Interview Skills. Keifenheim KE; Petzold ER; Junne F; Erschens RS; Speiser N; Herrmann-Werner A; Zipfel S; Teufel M GMS J Med Educ; 2017; 34(3):Doc35. PubMed ID: 28890926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement. Nasir AA; Yusuf AS; Abdur-Rahman LO; Babalola OM; Adeyeye AA; Popoola AA; Adeniran JO J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 25012605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance? Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability and dimensionality of students' and supervisors' mini-CEX scores in undergraduate medical clerkships - a multilevel factor analysis. Berendonk C; Rogausch A; Gemperli A; Himmel W BMC Med Educ; 2018 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 29739387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile. Junod Perron N; Louis-Simonet M; Cerutti B; Pfarrwaller E; Sommer J; Nendaz M BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):293. PubMed ID: 27846882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and implementation of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in CMF-surgery for dental students. Höfer SH; Schuebel F; Sader R; Landes C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 23257318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reflection and self-directed and group learning improve OSCE scores. Tagawa M; Imanaka H Clin Teach; 2010 Dec; 7(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 21134204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Reflective Learning with Feedback Improve Dental Students' Self-Perceived Competence in Clinical Preparedness? Ihm JJ; Seo DG J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 26834135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating 360° behavior-orientated feedback in communication skills training for medical undergraduates: concept, acceptance and students' self-ratings of communication competence. Engerer C; Berberat PO; Dinkel A; Rudolph B; Sattel H; Wuensch A BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):271. PubMed ID: 27756286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination. Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing Advanced Communication Skills via Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Faculty Versus Self, Peer, and Standardized Patient Assessors. Talwalkar JS; Murtha TD; Prozora S; Fortin AH; Morrison LJ; Ellman MS Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):294-307. PubMed ID: 32141335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical skills assessment: comparison of student and examiner assessment in an objective structured clinical examination. Jahan F; Sadaf S; Bhanji S; Naeem N; Qureshi R Educ Health (Abingdon); 2011 Aug; 24(2):421. PubMed ID: 22081647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Faculty as simulated patients (FSPs) in assessing medical students' clinical reasoning skills. Abdelkhalek NM; Hussein AM; Sulaiman N; Hamdy H Educ Health (Abingdon); 2009 Dec; 22(3):323. PubMed ID: 20029766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First-year medical students' assessment of their own communication skills: a video-based, open-ended approach. Zick A; Granieri M; Makoul G Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Oct; 68(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 17640843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs. Sader J; Cerutti B; Meynard L; Geoffroy F; Meister V; Paignon A; Junod Perron N BMC Med Educ; 2022 Jul; 22(1):572. PubMed ID: 35879752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]