BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31088991)

  • 21. Magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis.
    Qi Z; Wu B; Luo X; Zhu J; Shi H; Jin B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(29):e4216. PubMed ID: 27442645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic-Assisted PCI: The Future of Coronary Intervention?
    Stevenson A; Kirresh A; Ahmad M; Candilio L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Feb; 35():161-168. PubMed ID: 33867293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.
    Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Resource Utilization During Elective Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Mangels D; Fregoso A; Ang L; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 32(12):E321-E325. PubMed ID: 32829309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.
    Granada JF; Delgado JA; Uribe MP; Fernandez A; Blanco G; Leon MB; Weisz G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 21511227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ultra-Low Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Minimize the Risk for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.
    Azzalini L; Laricchia A; Regazzoli D; Mitomo S; Hachinohe D; Bellini B; Demir OM; Poletti E; Maccagni D; Colombo A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):176-182. PubMed ID: 30865912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cath Lab Robotics: Paradigm Change in Interventional Cardiology?
    Wegermann ZK; Swaminathan RV; Rao SV
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2019 Aug; 21(10):119. PubMed ID: 31473815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic technology in interventional cardiology: Current status and future perspectives.
    Mahmud E; Pourdjabbar A; Ang L; Behnamfar O; Patel MP; Reeves RR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(6):956-962. PubMed ID: 28795481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of coronary artery calcification in percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stents: Two-year clinical outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients from the ARRIVE program.
    Lee MS; Yang T; Lasala J; Cox D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):891-897. PubMed ID: 26756859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Real-life characteristics and outcomes of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: data from the prospective Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease (MULTICAD) Israeli Registry.
    Ram E; Goldenberg I; Kassif Y; Segev A; Lavee J; Einhorn-Cohen M; Raanani E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 54(4):717-723. PubMed ID: 29554237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).
    Brilakis ES; Banerjee S; Karmpaliotis D; Lombardi WL; Tsai TT; Shunk KA; Kennedy KF; Spertus JA; Holmes DR; Grantham JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):245-253. PubMed ID: 25700746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study).
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout SM; Jacoby ME; Collins JS; Borgman AS; Mulder AN; Elmore MA; Campbell JL; McNamara RF; Wohns DH
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Jan; 12(13):1569-1576. PubMed ID: 28105993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determinants of fluoroscopy time for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the NCDR(®).
    Fazel R; Curtis J; Wang Y; Einstein AJ; Smith-Bindman R; Tsai TT; Chen J; Shah ND; Krumholz HM; Nallamothu BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 82(7):1091-105. PubMed ID: 23703793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Plourde G; Pancholy SB; Nolan J; Jolly S; Rao SV; Amhed I; Bangalore S; Patel T; Dahm JB; Bertrand OF
    Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10009):2192-203. PubMed ID: 26411986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Concept, Data, and Clinical Application.
    Walters D; Omran J; Patel M; Reeves R; Ang L; Mahmud E
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2019 Apr; 8(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 30832939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Percutaneous coronary artery revascularization procedures in pediatric heart transplant recipients: A large single center experience.
    Turner ME; Addonizio LJ; Richmond ME; Zuckerman WA; Vincent JA; Torres AJ; Collins MB
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 27083510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through Transradial Approach: Experience in 4 Patients with Complex Lesions.
    Anuwatworn A; Ali Kahn M; Stys T; Petrasko M; Stys A
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2020 Apr; 47(2):144-148. PubMed ID: 32603464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.