These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31089232)

  • 1. Artificial intelligence is selecting grant reviewers in China.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2019 May; 569(7756):316-317. PubMed ID: 31089232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who would you share your funding with?
    Bollen J
    Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7717):143. PubMed ID: 30089925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European science: EC grant applicants need fuller feedback.
    Wasserman D
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):198. PubMed ID: 25391954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communication: Use multimedia in grant applications.
    Doran MR; Lott WB; Doran SE
    Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7483):291. PubMed ID: 24429618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
    Guglielmi G
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
    Roy HK
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH plans grant-review overhaul to reduce bias.
    Kozlov M
    Nature; 2022 Dec; 612(7941):602-603. PubMed ID: 36494447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UK funding ban sparks protests.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7237):391. PubMed ID: 19325593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A semi-automatic web based tool for the selection of research projects reviewers.
    Pupella V; Monteverde ME; Lombardo C; Belardelli F; Giacomini M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():950-4. PubMed ID: 25160328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cut too far.
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7237):385-6. PubMed ID: 19325579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research funding: Making the cut.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):383-5. PubMed ID: 20864969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revamp for NIH grants.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supporting the future.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):958. PubMed ID: 18563096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fund ideas, not pedigree, to find fresh insight.
    Sinkjær T
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):143. PubMed ID: 29517033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making an impact.
    Wu R
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A little idea. By Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2012 Apr; 125(Pt 7):1617-9. PubMed ID: 22715509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.