181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31089798)
1. Accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in discrimination of nasopharyngeal carcinoma from normal samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Su S; Zhang Y; Liu S; Jin H; Zeng Q; Cheng L
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 Jul; 145(7):1811-1821. PubMed ID: 31089798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of Fiber-Optic Raman Spectroscopy in the detection and diagnosis of head and neck neoplasm
Chen W; Chen Y; Wu C; Zhang X; Huang X
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16536. PubMed ID: 38099303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs for nasopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang Z; Chen W; Zhang Y; Xu L; Wang Q
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014 Nov; 10 Suppl():C173-8. PubMed ID: 25450278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by Raman spectroscopy provides high efficiency: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jin H; Zhang M; Huang L; Hao J; Zhou L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jan; 100(1):e23900. PubMed ID: 33429751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen C; Hao J; Hao X; Xu W; Xiao C; Zhang J; Pu Q; Liu L
Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Aug; 10(8):3680-3693. PubMed ID: 35116669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park JJ; Kim DK; Lee S; Choi Y; Kim YH; Lee JH; Kim KH; Kim JH
Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Feb; 10(2):574-583. PubMed ID: 33718060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Han R; Lin N; Huang J; Ma X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():925032. PubMed ID: 35992884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI and SPECT in the diagnosis of local residual/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Wei J; Pei S; Zhu X
Oral Oncol; 2016 Jan; 52():11-7. PubMed ID: 26547126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jin H; Zhang M; Jia K; Huang L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(52):e23884. PubMed ID: 33350784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fiber-Optic Raman Spectroscopy with Nature-Inspired Genetic Algorithms Enhances Real-Time in Vivo Detection and Diagnosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Žuvela P; Lin K; Shu C; Zheng W; Lim CM; Huang Z
Anal Chem; 2019 Jul; 91(13):8101-8108. PubMed ID: 31135136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Meta-analysis of PET/CT for diagnosis of residual/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Shen G; Zhou L; Jia Z; Zhang W; Wang Q; Deng H
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 29(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 25966558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in differentiating brain tumor from normal brain tissue.
Zhang J; Fan Y; He M; Ma X; Song Y; Liu M; Xu J
Oncotarget; 2017 May; 8(22):36824-36831. PubMed ID: 28415660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Circulating MicroRNA in diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a Meta-analysis].
Zhang JM; Lu MZ
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 33(6):517-524. PubMed ID: 31163526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hao J; Chen C; Jin H; Chen N; Zhou J; Zhu Y; Chung K; Pu Q
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 9(8):4750-4761. PubMed ID: 35117838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of Vibrational spectroscopy in the diagnosis of oral potentially malignant and malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shrivastava PK; Kumar A; Aggarwal Y; Kumar A; Agrawal A; Rai A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 37313896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jin H; Lin T; Han P; Yao Y; Zheng D; Hao J; Hu Y; Zeng R
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(47):e18066. PubMed ID: 31764837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis.
Shen ZW; Zhang LJ; Shen ZY; Zhang ZF; Xu F; Zhang X; Li R; Xiao Z
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():828346. PubMed ID: 35602511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Raman spectroscopy for differentiating skin cancer from normal tissue.
Zhang J; Fan Y; Song Y; Xu J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(34):e12022. PubMed ID: 30142850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Diagnosis of Residual or Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma After Radiotherapy: A Metaanalysis.
Zhou H; Shen G; Zhang W; Cai H; Zhou Y; Li L
J Nucl Med; 2016 Mar; 57(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 26541775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-time
Lin K; Zheng W; Lim CM; Huang Z
Theranostics; 2017; 7(14):3517-3526. PubMed ID: 28912892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
