439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31089882)
1. Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.
Wei D; Johnston S; Goldstein L; Nagle D
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):610-621. PubMed ID: 31089882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery-payer, provider, and patient benefits.
Keller DS; Senagore AJ; Fitch K; Bochner A; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2846-2853. PubMed ID: 27815745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of operative approach on postoperative outcomes and healthcare utilization after colectomy.
Mlambo B; Shih IF; Li Y; Wren SM
Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):320-327. PubMed ID: 34362589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of health-care utilization and expenditures for minimally invasive vs. open colectomy for benign disease.
Diaz SE; Lee YF; Bastawrous AL; Shih IF; Lee SH; Li Y; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7250-7258. PubMed ID: 35194661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A national database propensity score-matched comparison of minimally invasive and open colectomy for long-term opioid use.
Bastawrous AL; Brockhaus KK; Chang MI; Milky G; Shih IF; Li Y; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):701-710. PubMed ID: 33569727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Splenic flexure mobilization for sigmoid and low anterior resections in the minimally invasive era: How often and at what cost?
Pettke E; Leigh N; Shah A; Cekic V; Yan X; Kumara HMCS; Gandhi N; Whelan RL
Am J Surg; 2020 Jul; 220(1):191-196. PubMed ID: 31582178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do the advantages of a minimally invasive approach remain in complex colorectal procedures? A nationwide comparison.
Schlussel AT; Lustik MB; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Champagne BJ; Goldberg JE; Steele SR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Apr; 58(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 25751800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Keller DS; Delaney CP; Hashemi L; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4220-8. PubMed ID: 26715021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Bagante F; Spolverato G; Strasberg SM; Gani F; Thompson V; Hall BL; Bentrem DJ; Pitt HA; Pawlik TM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Sep; 20(9):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27412321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of intra-abdominal drain in minimally invasive right colectomy: a propensity score matched analysis on postoperative outcomes.
Solaini L; Cavaliere D; Pecchini F; Perna F; Avanzolini A; Vitali G; Mecheri F; Checcacci P; Cucchetti A; Coratti A; Piccoli M; Ercolani G
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2137-2141. PubMed ID: 31728608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database.
Gandaglia G; Ghani KR; Sood A; Meyers JR; Sammon JD; Schmid M; Varda B; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Sun M; Menon M; Kibel AS; Trinh QD
JAMA Surg; 2014 Oct; 149(10):1039-44. PubMed ID: 25143176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health-care expenditures are less for minimally invasive than open colectomy for colon cancer: A US commercial claims database analysis.
Bastawrous AL; Shih IF; Li Y; Khalil M; Almaz B; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6278-6287. PubMed ID: 37193891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive versus open surgery in the Medicare population: a comparison of post-operative and economic outcomes.
Fan CJ; Chien HL; Weiss MJ; He J; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Pawlik TM; Makary MA
Surg Endosc; 2018 Sep; 32(9):3874-3880. PubMed ID: 29484556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.
Delaney CP; Chang E; Senagore AJ; Broder M
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18438119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database.
Ahuja V; Paredes LG; Leeds IL; Perkal MF; King JT
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7199-7205. PubMed ID: 37365394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
