168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31089895)
1. Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?
Reddy KV; Jadhav A; Bhola N; Mishra A; Dakshinkar P
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 31089895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and safety of 1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study.
Brković B; Andrić M; Ćalasan D; Milić M; Stepić J; Vučetić M; Brajković D; Todorović L
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):779-785. PubMed ID: 27114091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can local anesthesia with ropivacaine provide postoperative analgesia in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars? A randomized clinical trial.
Amorim KS; Gercina AC; Ramiro FMS; Medeiros LA; de Araújo JSM; Groppo FC; Souza LMA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 May; 131(5):512-518. PubMed ID: 33223455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized double-blind study to assess the latency and efficacy of twin-mix and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a pilot study.
Bhargava D; Sreekumar K; Rastogi S; Deshpande A; Chakravorty N
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 23143710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Kakade AN; Joshi SS; Naik CS; Mhatre BV; Ansari A
J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2021 Oct; 21(5):451-459. PubMed ID: 34703894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of buprenorphine added to 2% lignocaine plus adrenaline 1:80,000 in providing postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery.
Chhabra N; Sharma P; Chhabra S; Gupta N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 45(12):1644-1651. PubMed ID: 27576596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial.
Karm MH; Park FD; Kang M; Kim HJ; Kang JW; Kim S; Kim YD; Kim CH; Seo KS; Kwon KH; Kim CH; Lee JW; Hong SW; Lim MH; Nam SK; Cho JM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 May; 96(21):e6753. PubMed ID: 28538371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine With 1:100,000 Adrenaline and 0.75% Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in the Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar.
Deshpande N; Jadhav A; Bhola ND; Gupta M
Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e29639. PubMed ID: 36321015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline in pain control in extraction of mandibular posterior teeth: A double-blind study.
Ranjan R; Santhosh Kumar SN; Singh M
Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(5):611-615. PubMed ID: 30409941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analgesic effect of a lidocaine-ropivacaine mixture for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Hemmi T; Sasahara N; Yusa K; Ishikawa S; Kobayashi T; Iino M
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Oct; 27(10):5969-5975. PubMed ID: 37608239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Two Different Anesthetic Solutions on Injection Pain, Efficacy, and Duration of Soft-Tissue Anesthesia with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Molars.
Elbay ÜŞ; Elbay M; Kaya E; Yıldırım S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 27805885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
Goyal R; Sharma P; Bali R
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2021 Jun; 20(2):234-239. PubMed ID: 33927491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is amalgamated ligno-bupivacaine an answer to complicated minor oral surgical anesthesia? A randomized split-mouth double-blind clinical trial.
Mishra A; Mahajan M; Bande C; Joshi A; Gawande M; Gupta MK
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 29362928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine, ropivacaine (with epinephrine) and their equal volume mixtures with lidocaine used for femoral and sciatic nerve blocks: a double-blind randomized study.
Cuvillon P; Nouvellon E; Ripart J; Boyer JC; Dehour L; Mahamat A; L'hermite J; Boisson C; Vialles N; Lefrant JY; de La Coussaye JE
Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):641-9. PubMed ID: 19151302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized anesthethic potency comparison between ropivacaine and bupivacaine on the perioperative regional anesthesia in lower third molar surgery.
Tijanic M; Buric N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 47(10):1652-1660. PubMed ID: 31395418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ropivacaine: a new local anaesthetic agent in maxillofacial surgery.
Budharapu A; Sinha R; Uppada UK; Subramanya Kumar AV
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 53(5):451-4. PubMed ID: 25818492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Lidocaine including Buprenorphine for Postoperative Analgesia after the Extraction of Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled, Double-Blind, Split-Mouth Study.
Jawanda NK; Shukla A; Singh A; Pentapati KC; Gadicherla S
ScientificWorldJournal; 2021; 2021():7097948. PubMed ID: 34812251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and Safety of 2% and 4% Articaine for Lower Third Molar Surgery.
Senes AM; Calvo AM; Colombini-Ishikiriama BL; Gonçalves PZ; Dionísio TJ; Sant'ana E; Brozoski DT; Lauris JR; Faria FA; Santos CF
J Dent Res; 2015 Sep; 94(9 Suppl):166S-73S. PubMed ID: 26202994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
Mittal J; Kaur G; Mann HS; Narang S; Kamra M; Kapoor S; Sindhi M; Kataria R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):743-748. PubMed ID: 29959306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
