These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31089988)
1. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients following total hip or knee replacement. Jin X; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Marshall DA; Johnson JA Qual Life Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2409-2417. PubMed ID: 31089988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The EQ-5D-5L Is Superior to the -3L Version in Measuring Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Awaiting THA or TKA. Jin X; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Marshall DA; Smith C; Johnson JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jul; 477(7):1632-1644. PubMed ID: 30801280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement. Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Noseworthy TW Qual Life Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1311-1322. PubMed ID: 29423757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Bilbao A; García-Pérez L; Arenaza JC; García I; Ariza-Cardiel G; Trujillo-Martín E; Forjaz MJ; Martín-Fernández J Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2897-2908. PubMed ID: 29978346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Loucks L; Al Khudairy A; Noseworthy TW Qual Life Res; 2015 Jul; 24(7):1775-84. PubMed ID: 25555837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): thresholds for the EQ-5D-5L and Oxford hip and knee scores for patients with total hip and knee replacement. Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Loucks L; Noseworthy TW Qual Life Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):519-530. PubMed ID: 36367656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How do EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L compare in a Swedish total hip replacement population? Eneqvist T; Nemes S; Kärrholm J; Burström K; Rolfson O Acta Orthop; 2020 Jun; 91(3):272-278. PubMed ID: 32237930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in psoriasis patients. Poór AK; Rencz F; Brodszky V; Gulácsi L; Beretzky Z; Hidvégi B; Holló P; Kárpáti S; Péntek M Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3409-3419. PubMed ID: 28875430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients. Golicki D; Niewada M; Karlińska A; Buczek J; Kobayashi A; Janssen MF; Pickard AS Qual Life Res; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 25425288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Responsiveness of the anxiety/depression dimension of the 3- and 5-level versions of the EQ-5D in assessing mental health. Crick K; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Johnson JA Qual Life Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1625-1633. PubMed ID: 29516342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients. Garratt AM; Furunes H; Hellum C; Solberg T; Brox JI; Storheim K; Johnsen LG Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 May; 19(1):155. PubMed ID: 34049574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients. Breheny K; Hollingworth W; Kandiyali R; Dixon P; Loose A; Craggs P; Grzeda M; Sparrow J Qual Life Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1935-1946. PubMed ID: 32080789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Participation in a Preoperative Patient Education Session Is a Significant Predictor of Better WOMAC Total Index Score and Higher EQ-5D-5L Health Status Index 1 Year After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasties: A Retrospective Observational Study. Marques CJ; Bohlen K; Lampe F Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Oct; 100(10):972-977. PubMed ID: 33443861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery. Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N Patient; 2019 Aug; 12(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 30607809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery. Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):501-511. PubMed ID: 31902023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in recording self-reported health status in older patients with substantial multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Bhadhuri A; Kind P; Salari P; Jungo KT; Boland B; Byrne S; Hossmann S; Dalleur O; Knol W; Moutzouri E; O'Mahony D; Murphy KD; Wisselink L; Rodondi N; Schwenkglenks M Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Sep; 18(1):317. PubMed ID: 32993637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot study on the validity and psychometric properties of the electronic EQ-5D-5L in routine clinical practice. Lam CLK; Tse ETY; Wong CKH; Lam JSM; Chen SS; Bedford LE; Cheung JPY; Or CK; Kind P Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Dec; 19(1):266. PubMed ID: 34922564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in patients with Crohn's disease. Rencz F; Lakatos PL; Gulácsi L; Brodszky V; Kürti Z; Lovas S; Banai J; Herszényi L; Cserni T; Molnár T; Péntek M; Palatka K Qual Life Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):141-152. PubMed ID: 30225788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-3L in hypertensive patients living in rural China. Jiang J; Hong Y; Zhang T; Yang Z; Lin T; Liang Z; Lu P; Liu L; Wang B; Xu Y; Luo N Qual Life Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):2045-2060. PubMed ID: 33821418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS stand-alone component and Oxford knee score in the Australian knee arthroplasty population utilising minimally important difference, concurrent validity, predictive validity and responsiveness. Lin DY; Cheok TS; Kaambwa B; Samson AJ; Morrison C; Chan T; Kroon HM; Jaarsma RL Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 May; 21(1):41. PubMed ID: 37165364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]