191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31090479)
1. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.
Bogoevski K; Woloszyk A; Blackwood K; Woodruff MA; Glatt V
J Histochem Cytochem; 2019 Aug; 67(8):545-561. PubMed ID: 31090479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.
Savi FM; Brierly GI; Baldwin J; Theodoropoulos C; Woodruff MA
J Histochem Cytochem; 2017 Dec; 65(12):705-722. PubMed ID: 28958188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Decalcification Techniques for Rat Femurs Using HE and Immunohistochemical Staining.
Liu H; Zhu R; Liu C; Ma R; Wang L; Chen B; Li L; Niu J; Zhao D; Mo F; Fu M; Brömme D; Zhang D; Gao S
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9050754. PubMed ID: 28246608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of immunohistochemical detection of collagen type II in osteochondral sections by comparing decalcification and antigen retrieval agent combinations.
Amirtham SM; Ozbey O; Kachroo U; Ramasamy B; Vinod E
Clin Anat; 2020 Apr; 33(3):343-349. PubMed ID: 31381185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of three decalcification agents for assessments of cranial fracture histomorphology.
Cornelison JB; Isaac CV; Devota CJ; Billian J; Brown TT; deJong JL; Douglas EA; Fisher-Hubbard AO; Lackey-Cornelison WL; Prahlow JA; Shattuck BL
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 35112350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparative analyses of decalcification procedures and methyl benzoate pre-treatment on tissue preservation and antigenicity in human acetabular labra.
Pieroh P; Ehrlich A; Ghadban C; Litvak L; Steinke H; Josten C; Fakler JKM; Dehghani F
Histol Histopathol; 2019 Aug; 34(8):899-908. PubMed ID: 30758043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of EDTA and nitric acid solutions for decalcification of joints in AG/WT, BALB/c, C57, DBA1/J mice, and in Wistar rats.
Freitas EC; Dalmolin SP; da Silva MM; de Oliveira FH; Pilar EFS
Biotech Histochem; 2022 Jul; 97(5):372-381. PubMed ID: 34845957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of decalcification protocols on immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses of bone samples.
Miquelestorena-Standley E; Jourdan ML; Collin C; Bouvier C; Larousserie F; Aubert S; Gomez-Brouchet A; Guinebretière JM; Tallegas M; Brulin B; Le Nail LR; Tallet A; Le Loarer F; Massiere J; Galant C; de Pinieux G
Mod Pathol; 2020 Aug; 33(8):1505-1517. PubMed ID: 32094425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of routine decalcification methods with microwave decalcification of bone and teeth.
Sangeetha R; Uma K; Chandavarkar V
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2013 Sep; 17(3):386-91. PubMed ID: 24574657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of two different tissue decalcification methods for immunohistochemistry].
Du J; Liu JY; Su J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Apr; 43(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 21503129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-Step Preservation and Decalcification of Bony Tissue for Molecular Profiling.
Mueller C; Harpole MG; Espina V
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1606():85-102. PubMed ID: 28501995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency of different decalcification protocols for nasal osseous structures in a rat experimental model of allergic rhinitis, and their effects on epithelial histology: an attempt at standardization.
Guibas GV; Lakis S; Gkimpas C; Manda M; Kapoukranidou D; Spandou E
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2014 Dec; 66(9-10):469-75. PubMed ID: 25238695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tissue integrity, costs and time associated with different agents for histological bone preparation.
Abrantes AA; Rafacho A; Rivero ER; Mariano FV; Siqueira FM; Gondak RO
Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Apr; 80(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 28370969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. RNA preservation in decalcified cochlear samples.
Waissbluth S; Chan SW; Chen JZ; McIntosh M; Daniel SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 23250382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the Effects of Various Decalcification Protocols on Immunohistochemical Staining in Zebrafish (
Meritet DM; Spagnoli ST; Fischer KA; Löhr CV
Zebrafish; 2019 Jun; 16(3):280-290. PubMed ID: 31017539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Study of methods of decalcification for making united slices of tooth and affiliated periodontic tissues].
Wang Y; Mu YB; Miao LY; Sun HC; Li CK
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Mar; 42(3):150-1. PubMed ID: 17565821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of various decalcification techniques.
Prasad P; Donoghue M
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 24025875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of ultrasound accelerates the decalcification process of bone matrix without affecting histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Chow DH; Zheng L; Tian L; Ho KS; Qin L; Guo X
J Orthop Translat; 2019 Apr; 17():112-120. PubMed ID: 31194084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of decalcifying agents and techniques for human dental tissues.
Choube A; Astekar M; Choube A; Sapra G; Agarwal A; Rana A
Biotech Histochem; 2018; 93(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 29313383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between Conventional Decalcification and a Microwave-Assisted Method in Bone Tissue Affected with Mycetoma.
Salih MM
Biochem Res Int; 2020; 2020():6561980. PubMed ID: 32832156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
