These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31091515)

  • 41. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound does not improve training in fetal biometric measurements.
    Chan LW; Ting YH; Lao TT; Chau MM; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1173-5. PubMed ID: 21231840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements.
    Chan LW; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19277977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
    Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
    Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
    Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The feasibility of using 5D CNS software in obtaining standard fetal head measurements from volumes acquired by three-dimensional ultrasonography: comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound.
    Rizzo G; Aiello E; Pietrolucci ME; Arduini D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2217-22. PubMed ID: 26364724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of automated vs. manual measurement to estimate fetal weight in isolated polyhydramnios.
    Eroglu H; Orgul G; Avcı E; Altınboga O; Karakoc G; Yucel A
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Aug; 47(6):592-597. PubMed ID: 31141491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
    Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth.
    Salomon LJ; Alfirevic Z; Da Silva Costa F; Deter RL; Figueras F; Ghi T; Glanc P; Khalil A; Lee W; Napolitano R; Papageorghiou A; Sotiriadis A; Stirnemann J; Toi A; Yeo G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):715-723. PubMed ID: 31169958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Femur-sparing pattern of abnormal fetal growth in pregnant women from New York City after maternal Zika virus infection.
    Walker CL; Merriam AA; Ohuma EO; Dighe MK; Gale M; Rajagopal L; Papageorghiou AT; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Adams Waldorf KM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):187.e1-187.e20. PubMed ID: 29738748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Automatic biometry of fetal brain MRIs using deep and machine learning techniques.
    She J; Huang H; Ye Z; Huang W; Sun Y; Liu C; Yang W; Wang J; Ye P; Zhang L; Ning G
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17860. PubMed ID: 37857681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Automatic Estimation of Fetal Abdominal Circumference From Ultrasound Images.
    Jang J; Park Y; Kim B; Lee SM; Kwon JY; Seo JK
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 Sep; 22(5):1512-1520. PubMed ID: 29990257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A new approach to automatic measure fetal head circumference in ultrasound images using convolutional neural networks.
    Yang C; Yang Z; Liao S; Guo J; Yin S; Liu C; Kang Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Aug; 147():105801. PubMed ID: 35785663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fetal biometry charts for normal pregnant women in northeastern Thailand.
    Saksiriwuttho P; Ratanasiri T; Komwilaisak R
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):1963-9. PubMed ID: 18041409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A retrospective fetal ultrasound study of brain size in autism.
    Hobbs K; Kennedy A; Dubray M; Bigler ED; Petersen PB; McMahon W; Lainhart JE
    Biol Psychiatry; 2007 Nov; 62(9):1048-55. PubMed ID: 17555719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis in the assessment of trainee competence in fetal biometry measurement.
    Weerasinghe S; Mirghani H; Revel A; Abu-Zidan FM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 16858722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
    von Kaisenberg CS; Fritzer E; Kühling H; Jonat W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.
    Nasrat H; Bondagji NS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Feb; 88(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15694104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Deep learning fetal ultrasound video model match human observers in biometric measurements.
    Płotka S; Klasa A; Lisowska A; Seliga-Siwecka J; Lipa M; Trzciński T; Sitek A
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(4):. PubMed ID: 35051921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.