These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31091738)

  • 1. A Laboratory Word Memory Test Analogue Differentiates Intentional Feigning from True Responding Using the P300 Event-Related Potential.
    Shelley-Tremblay JF; Eyer JC; Hill BD
    Brain Sci; 2019 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31091738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feigning memory impairment in a forced-choice task: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Jansen MT; Tamm S; Merten T; Tamm A; Hofmann MJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Dec; 158():190-200. PubMed ID: 33086099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of education level on design-induced N170 and P300 components of event related potentials in the human brain.
    Begum T; Reza F; Ahmed I; Abdullah JM
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 13(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 24738540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Relationship Between Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptom Feigning Among Forensic Inpatients Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
    Gottfried E; Glassmire D
    Assessment; 2016 Dec; 23(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 26253572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment in severe traumatic brain injury patients with the Forced-choice Graphics Memory Test.
    Liu Z; Dong J; Zhao X; Chen X; Lippa SM; Caroselli JS; Fang X
    Brain Behav; 2016 Dec; 6(12):e00593. PubMed ID: 28032009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of feigned recognition memory impairment using the old/new effect of the event-related potential.
    Tardif HP; Barry RJ; Fox AM; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2000 Apr; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10700618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction.
    Hoover S; Zottoli TM; Grose-Fifer J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 24394183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trial 1 versus Trial 2 of the Test of Memory Malingering: Evaluating accuracy without a "gold standard".
    Mossman D; Wygant DB; Gervais RO; Hart KJ
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Jan; 30(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 28252976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting feigned traumatic brain injury with eye tracking during a test of performance validity.
    Kanser RJ; Bashem JR; Patrick SD; Hanks RA; Rapport LJ
    Neuropsychology; 2020 Mar; 34(3):308-320. PubMed ID: 31944789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Validity-10 index to detect symptom exaggeration: An analogue simulation study.
    Sullivan KA; Lange RT; Edmed SL
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2016; 23(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 26943718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests.
    Tan JE; Slick DJ; Strauss E; Hultsch DF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 16(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 12822058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye tracking as a mean to detect feigned cognitive impairment in the word memory test.
    Tomer E; Lupu T; Golan L; Wagner M; Braw Y
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2020; 27(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 30183408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of complexity of visual distracters on attention and information processing speed reflected in auditory p300.
    Wilson MJ; Harkrider AW; King KA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):480-8. PubMed ID: 22343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-cultural feigning assessment: A systematic review of feigning instruments used with linguistically, ethnically, and culturally diverse samples.
    Nijdam-Jones A; Rosenfeld B
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1321-1336. PubMed ID: 28080105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of event-related potential (P300) and neuropsychological testing to evaluate cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury patients.
    Nandrajog P; Idris Z; Azlen WN; Liyana A; Abdullah JM
    Asian J Neurosurg; 2017; 12(3):447-453. PubMed ID: 28761523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the yes/no recognition response pattern to detect memory malingering.
    Schindler S; Kissler J; Kühl KP; Hellweg R; Bengner T
    BMC Psychol; 2013; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 25566364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting symptom- and test-coached simulators with the test of memory malingering.
    Powell MR; Gfeller JD; Hendricks BL; Sharland M
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Aug; 19(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 15271412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Memory timeline: Brain ERP C250 (not P300) is an early biomarker of short-term storage.
    Chapman RM; Gardner MN; Mapstone M; Dupree HM; Antonsdottir IM
    Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 1604():74-83. PubMed ID: 25641043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Faking bad: The neural correlates of feigning memory impairment.
    Kosheleva E; Spadoni AD; Strigo IA; Buchsbaum MS; Simmons AN
    Neuropsychology; 2016 Mar; 30(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 26765340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.